My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08754
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08754
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:14:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/12/1968
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />MYRON B. HOLBURT <br />4. SALINITY OF WATER DELIVERED TO MEXICO <br /> <br /> <br />Salinity standards established for United States users will have a bearing on the salinity of the <br />Colorado River water delivered to Mexico. Tllfough the beneficial use of the Colorado's flow on up- <br />lands, the salts in the river at the Mexican border are considerably concentrated. Just above the entry <br />of the river into Mexico, a source of heavily saline drainage water from the Wellton-Mohawk Project <br />in Arizona is added to the already saline river. In 1965, under an agreement with Mexico, the United <br />States constructed a channel which can bypass the saline water from the project around the Mexican <br />diversion dam. A final solution must be developed within the next 18 months. <br /> <br />5. FEDERAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS <br /> <br />Basin legislators and water leaders have been very concerned with the slowdown that has occ- <br />urred in obtaining appropriations for authorized projects. The total backlog of authorized but unfund- <br />ed reclamation projects is over $5 billion. Further, at the rate of funding experienced for the past <br />several years, it would take more than twenty years to complete construction of those presently auth- <br />orized projects, <br /> <br />States with authorized projects will naturally tend to concentrate their efforts on obtaining <br />sufficient construction funds for their projeCts. It is hoped that the competition for funds will not <br />impair the necessary effort required to solve problems which effect the entire basin. <br /> <br />6. OTHER PROBLEMS <br /> <br />Other problems include (a) the conflict between wildlife conservationists and water users em- <br />bodied in programs to control phreatophytes, manage the river, and develop the watersheds; (b) the <br />unresolved issues remaining in Arizona v. California; and (c) the inherent problems resulting from P, L. <br />90-537's direction that the Secretary of the Interior must follow the Law of the River and that any <br />affected state may bring suit if it is considered that the Secretary has failed to comply with appli- <br />cable law. <br /> <br />This list of unresolved items is not complete, but it does illustrate that there are as yet many <br />significant items that must be resolved either through give-and-take negotiations or through extended <br />and expensive litigation. It is hoped that the course of future efforts will be concentrated in the negot- <br />iations field with a continuation of the spirit of cooperation among the seven states that has developed <br />during the past three years. <br /> <br />THE KEY TO THE PROBLEMS <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />The key to resolving most of the problems that I have mentioned, and of course, the"larger <br />problem which"1 have not discussed - - that of insufficient water - - is augmentation of the river. With <br />an increased water supply: the Mexican Treaty burden problem is answered, the operating problems <br />of" the major dams become minimal, the salinity values will drop, both for the Lower Basin and <br />Mexico, and the unresolved problems between water users and conservationists become much more <br />susceptible of resolution. In short, we will all have something to negotiate with and for. This, with the <br />reasonable assurance of a supply of water sufficient to meet ligitimate demands entering the river at a <br />specific future date, it would be possiblt to negotiate interim agreements on the many issues facing <br />the river basin states. <br /> <br />Studies by the Colorado River Board of California show conclusively that such an augmenta- <br />tion of the Colorado River water supply is needed - - and at the earliest practicable date. This conclu- <br />sion should not come as news to knowledgeable Westerners, or even to Congress, as is evident in the <br />congressional reports on the Colorado River Basin Project Act. <br /> <br />Our studies indicate a water augmentation need of approximately three and one half million <br />acre-feet per year just to meet the Mexican Water Treaty obligation, to assure Lower Basin basic ap- <br />portionments, and to operate the existing Metropolitan Water District project and the future Central <br />Arizona Project at full capacity. In addition, preliminary analyses show a potential demand for a great <br />deal more water. Other investigators of Colorado River water demands and supplies have likewise in- <br />cluded that the river needs to be augmented, with varying dates for initial shortages. In a series of con- <br />gressional hearings on the Colorado River Project, the concerned states and the federal government <br /> <br />-41- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.