Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PANEL DISCUSSION: LET'S LOOK AT BIG RED <br /> <br />OPENING REMARKS <br />By IVAL V. GOSLIN, Executive Director <br />Upper Colorado River CommlSllon, S:alt Lake City. Utah <br /> <br />I have since been informed that "Big Red" means the Colorado River and that "let's look" re- <br />fers to today and into the future with respect to the situation on the river from the standpoint of wa- <br />ter and the problems associated therewith, I have also been enlightened to the fact that to function as <br />a moderator one is supposed to arbitrate or mediate. <br /> <br />I hope that something to mediate does come from this panel. There is nothing disgraceful <br />about differences of opinion, Only by laying the problems on the table is it possible to see what they <br />;Ire ~nd to discuss them. Only by making the other felldw aware of your problem can you expect to <br />enlist his aid in their resolution, <br /> <br />More specifically, the discussion by this group is going to be centered around a new law that <br />was signed on September 30th by the President, I am referring to P. L. 90-537, the Colorado River <br />Basin Project Act of 1968. This law came into being only after twelve years of legal battling followed <br />by five years of legislative controversy during the negotiations among the seven basin States in prepar- <br />ation of the authorizing bill. <br /> <br />Each of the States represented on the panel is affected either positively or negatively - - bene- <br />ficially or adversely - - by this Act, Sometimes the legislation has been called the great compromise bill, <br />Sometimes the Bill, or parts of it, are relegated to the category formerly distinguished by the Monkey- <br />Ward catalogue in grandpa's "two-holer", <br /> <br />At this point I wish to introduce our participants. and briefly describe how they will operate. <br /> <br />I. Myron Holburt, Chief Engineer of the Colorado River Board of California, has been named <br />as our "keynoter". His function will be to highlight several problems confronting the Colorado River <br />Basin as a whole that have either not been solved by enactment of P. L. 90-537, or have resulted be- <br />cause of it; or that may occur in the future, as he views the situation, under certain premises that he <br />will discuss. <br /> <br />2. Next is our panel of distinguished representatives from the 7 States of the Colorado River <br />Basin with whom I am highly honored to be associated, The panel will listen attentively, I hope, to the <br />problems raised by Mr. Holburt. Each panel member will then be given five minutes to discuss the pro- <br />lems raised by the "keynoter" as they relate to his State as a member of the Colorado River family, <br />The panelist if, of course, not precluded from raising other questions - - related or not related to those <br />discussed by the "keynoter", <br /> <br />Wyoming <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado <br /> <br />Nevada <br /> <br />Utah <br /> <br />New Mexico <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />.. <br />~ <br /> <br />Introducticins <br /> <br />PANEL MEMBERS <br /> <br />Del1)ert L. Boyer <br />Assistand State Engineer <br /> <br />Felix L. Sparks <br />Director <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Ivan P. Head <br />Director <br />Las Vegas Valley Water District <br /> <br />ThQrpe Waddingham <br />Attorney at Law <br />Commissioner on Upper Colorado <br />. River Commission <br /> <br />David p, Hale <br />Engineer <br />Nej,v Mexico Interstate Stream Commission <br /> <br />-38- <br />