Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Reader's' fomm <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Public involvement questioned <br /> <br />As a scientist and fisherman, I am <br />concerned about Impacts' of the <br />program on what many orus in west-' <br />ern Colorado view. as our fish and <br />wildlife resources. I noticed that your <br />program will, be independently <br />reviewed by nationally' and interna- <br />tionally recognized scientists. This is. <br />great, but aren't you forgetting the <br />public? Is there a forum for public <br />involv<lment in the process? After aft, <br />we are paying the bills. ' <br />I know the program has been enact' <br />ed because of the Congressional man- <br />dates in the Endangered Species Act, <br />but it seems to me that the National <br />Environmental Policy Act also requires, <br />that the program look into the impacts <br />on human health and the environment. <br />Policies such as poisoning non-native <br />fish species could have some serious <br />, ' <br />impacts if not approached with great <br />care. I would be interested in finding <br />out more about how the 'public can <br />become involved in the process: <br />- David Smuin <br />Grand Junction, Cola', <br /> <br />There are several ways the public <br />can be and is involved in the Recovery , <br />Prograrn. Meetings are often held to <br />'solicit citizens'. input ,on, courses ,oj' <br />action that could affect the public. For <br />'example, Jour public 'meetings were <br />held last December in western <br />Colorado and. eastern Utah an the <br />draft guidelines for siocking ~on- <br />native fish in the uppa CO/(Jrado River <br />. Basin. A{eet.ing. a,nn~uncements were <br />sent to local and regi.onalnewspapers. <br />and several 'hundred flyers were <br />mailed to members of angler andenvi- <br />, ronmental .organizations. <br />, Regarding the Nati.onal' Environ, <br />mental PoliCy Act, the program will com- <br />'ply withNEPA before taking major <br />recovery' actions., For example, the <br />. Bureau .of Reclamation completed NEPA <br />compliance last year to evaluate the <br />environmental impacts .of building a fish <br />ladder at the Redlands Diversion Dam. <br />To stay apprised of Rec.overy <br />Program actions; you may want to <br />receive a status report produced about <br />everyfour months (iliadditi.on to this, <br />newsletter), T.o receive ihe status' rep.ort. <br /> <br />please write: Colorado River Recovery <br />Program, US, Fish and Wildlife, <br />Service, Po. Box 25486, Denver, Co. <br />80225, or call (303) 236-2985, ext. 225. <br />You also asked ,about "poisoning" <br />non-native fISh species. Under the draft <br />non-native fISh st.ocking procedures, the' <br />'Col.orado Division of Wildlife and u.s. <br />Fish and Wlidlife Service.would offer to <br />,work with landowners on a voluntary <br />basis 10 eliminaie non-native wam1wa- . <br />tel' fish from private ponds in the 50- <br />year flood plain near Grand Junction. <br />The non-native fish would be <br />removed using r.otenone, a plant deriva- <br />tive, and the ponds could' then ,be <br />restocked with, non-native bluegill, <br />largemouth bass or black crappie, which <br />appear to pose less of a risk to endan- <br />geredjish. Biologists will use extreme, <br />"caution to prevent rot~none from enter- <br />, ing the river.', <br />Rotenone is toxic to fish' but not t.o <br />birds, mammals or people. <br />lf you would like to comment 'on the <br />prop.osed procedures, please contact <br />us at the above address or phone. <br /> <br />WETLANDS, from 6 ' , <br /> <br />Program biologists and on property <br />owners themselves, Nelson said. ' <br />"We will, approach landowners and <br />the Ute Tribe to see, if they would be <br />willing to particip'ate, but we'll work on <br />a 'willing participant' basis only," he, <br />says. "Still, we're optimistic that there <br />will be enough interest, that, we can, <br />restore habitat to the degree necessary <br />to bring this species back." , <br />Hamill agrees. "We're fortunate, in <br />that fairly large quantities of the middle <br />Green River system are in federal' or <br />state ownership," he said., "there are <br />approximately '70 landowners' with <br />12,000 acres. Our goal is to try and <br /> <br />Natives battle non-natives for survival <br />As .the . restoration work advances, <br />crews will monitor the' razorback popu- <br />lation to see if it can survive and even <br />,floUrish despite ,the' presence of non- <br />native fish. This alone could be a chal- <br />lenge for the endangered ',fish. When <br />Modde's crew drained the wetland men: <br /> <br />7 <br />