Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0061 <br /> <br />Table 14. Trophic-state indices for sites M2B, M1B, and <br />M4B at Lake Meredith <br /> <br />ITSI, trophic-Slate index: SD, Secchi-disk depth; TP. total phosphorus; <br />ChI. chlorophyll oj <br /> <br />Sampling Blta TSI TSI TSI <br />(1Ig.3) (SO) (TP) (Chi) <br />M2B 87 70 50 <br />MIB 82 72 52 <br />M4B 87 76 56 <br />Average (all sites) 85 73 53 <br /> <br />Lake Meredith is hypereutrophic with respect to Secchi- <br />disk depth and total-phosphorus concentration and <br />eutrophic with respect to chlorophyll a concentration. <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF SELECTED WATER- <br />QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN <br />LAKE HENRY AND LAKE MEREDITH <br /> <br />Water released from Lake Henry can be diverted <br />into one of the inflows to Lake Meredith (fig. I); there- <br />fore, the water quality of Lake Henry may have an effect <br />on the water quality of Lake Meredith. <br />During the sampling period, the thennal properties <br />of Lake Henry and Lake Meredith were similar. Both <br />lakes were thennally stratified on the May sampling date <br />and not stratified on the June sampling date. and temper- <br />ature profiles of both lakes were similar on the August <br />and October sampling dates. Dissolved-oxygen concen- <br />trations and pH values in Lake Henry and in Lake <br />Meredith were larger near the lake surface and were <br />smaller near the lake bottom because of the effect of pho- <br />tosynthesis and respiration by phytoplankton. Average <br />specific conductance in Lake Henry was about one-third <br />the average specific conductance in Lake Meredith indi- <br />cating that Lake Henry had smaller dissolved-solids con- <br />centrations than did Lake Meredith. <br />Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations varied <br />between Lake Henry and Lake Meredith. Concentrations <br />of total nitrogen averaged about I. I mg/L in Lake Henry <br />and less than about 1.6 mgIL in Lake Meredith. Concen- <br />trations of total phosphorus averaged about 0.066 mgIL <br />in Lake Henry and about 0.106 mgIL in Lake Meredith. <br />The ratios of dissolved-inorganic nitrogen to dissolved <br />orthophosphate as phosphorus for Lake Henry and Lake <br />Meredith indicate that phosphorus has the potential of <br />being the limiting plant nutrient in both lakes. However, <br />the large algal biomass sampled in each lake indicates <br /> <br />neither nitrogen nor phosphorus are limiting nutri- <br />ents. The predominant chemical constituents were <br />calcium and sulfate in Lake Henry and sodium and <br />sulfate in Lake Meredith. The water in both lakes <br />had a small sodium-adsorption ratio. However. the <br />sodium-adsorption ratio values for Lake Meredith <br />(average about 5) were substantially larger than for <br />Lake Henry (average about 1.4). Concentrations of <br />total-recoverable iron in Lake Henry and total- <br />recoverable iron and total-recoverable boron in <br />Lake Meredith were the only chemical constituents <br />that occasionally exceeded the water-quality stan- <br />dards established by the Colorado Department of <br />Health (1987). The larger concentrations of total- <br />recoverable iron and total-recoverable boron may <br />have been caused by reducing conditions in the <br />lower depths of the lakes under depleted dissolved- <br />oxygen concentrations or concentration byevapo- <br />ration. <br />The average phytoplankton densities in Lake <br />Henry were about 38 percent of the average phy- <br />toplankton densities in Lake Meredith. During the <br />sampling period. blue-green algae comprised the <br />largest percentage of the phytoplankton densities <br />in both lakes. The trophic status of both lakes <br />would be considered eutrophic using trophic-clas- <br />sification systems developed by Carlson (1977) <br />and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation <br />and Development (1982); however, Lake Meredith <br />could be considered more eutrophic than Lake <br />Henry. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Lake Henry and Lake Meredith are shallow, <br />off-stream storage reservoirs for the Colorado <br />Canal. Water stored in each lake primarily is used <br />for agricultural purposes. The Colorado Depart- <br />ment of Health has established water-quality stan- <br />dards pertaining to the uses of both lakes. <br />Lake Henry and Lake Meredith were sam- <br />pled four times during 1987 for the purposes of; <br />(I) Evaluating selected water-quality characteris- <br />tics of each lake; (2) comparing the current water <br />quality of Lake Henry and Lake Meredith to water- <br />quality standards established by the Colorado <br />Department of Health (1987); (3) describing the <br />trophic status of each lake; and (4) comparing the <br />water-quality between the two lakes. <br />During the study period. water temperature <br />in Lake Henry ranged from 14.2 to 26.40C. The <br />lake was thennally stratified on May I and not <br />stratified on June 29. Concentrations of dissolved <br />oxygen ranged from 4.7 to 7.8 mgIL; the pH <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF SELECTED WATER-OUALlTY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN LAKE HENRY AND LAKE MEREDITH 29 <br />