Laserfiche WebLink
<br />005::; <br /> <br />Biological Constituents <br /> <br />The biological constituents analyzed in water <br />samples collected from Lalce Henry included phyto- <br />plankton and chlorophyll a. Phytoplankton popula- <br />tions are seldom homogeneous within a lalce; therefore. <br />the biological samples collected from Lalce Henry may <br />not be representative of the entire lalce. <br />The groups of phytoplankton that occurred in <br />Lake Henry during the sampling period were Bacillar- <br />iophyta (diatoms), Chlorophyta (green algae), <br />Chrysophyta (golden-brown algae), Cryptophyta <br />(cryptomonads). Cyanophyta (blue-green algae). and <br />Euglenophyta (euglenoids) (table ]7, "Supplemental <br />Data" section at the back of this report). The densities <br />of phytoplankton collected near the lake surface at site <br />HEW2 varied from 33,000 cells/mL on June 29 to <br />930,000 cells/mL on August] 9 (fig. 7). On each sam- <br />pling date. blue-green algae comprised the greatest per- <br />centage of the phytoplankton density. <br />Of the total phytoplankton density on May I, dia- <br />toms comprised about 0.4 percent; green algae com- <br />prised about 12 percent (Chlorella and Coccomyxa <br />minor were the dominant algae); and cryptomonads <br />comprised about 19 percent (Rhodomonas minura was <br />the only species detected). Cryptomonads are consid- <br />ered to be common winter algae (Wetzel, 1975), which <br />might account for the larger concentration of this group <br />analyzed on May I. On May I, blue:green algae com- <br />prised about 69 percent of the total !'hytoplankton den- <br />sity. Of this group, the most dominant genera were <br />Aphanothece, Chroococcus, Microcyst/s, and SynecllO- <br />coccus. <br />The total phytoplankton density of 33,000 <br />cells/mL on June 29 was less than analyzed on May I. <br />According to Wetzel (]975). phytoplankton densities <br />commonly increase in the spring and then decrease to a <br />brief summer minimum. Of the total phytoplankton <br />density on June 29, diatoms comprised about 10 per- <br />cent (Melosira granulata was the dominant species); <br />green algae comprised about] I percent (Coccomyxa <br />minor was the dominant species); blue-green algae <br />comprised about 79 percent; and cryptomonads and <br />golden-brown algae comprised the remaining percent- <br />age. <br />A substantial increase in phytoplankton densities <br />occurred between June 29 and August 19. On <br />August 19. the total cell count was 930,000 cells/mL, <br />and about 98 percent were blue-green algae. In more <br />eutrophic lalces. the brief summer minimum often is <br />followed by a late summer profusion of blue-green <br />algae that lasts into autumn (Wetzel, 1975). Of the <br />blue-green algae collected in August, about 91 percent <br />were of the genus M/crocyst/s. This algae commonly <br /> <br />occurs in hard water and tends to develop in nutrient- <br />rich, eutrophic lalces during the warmest summer <br />months (Hutchinson. 1967; Greeson, 1982). Various <br />water-quality problems are associated with an abun- <br />dant M/crocystis population. This algae, where present <br />in large masses, is capable of producing a foul odor and <br />taste and may cause the death offish in heavily infested <br />lalces (Palmer, 1977; Greeson, 1982). <br /> <br />The phytoplankton population remained large on <br />October 6 with a total density of 900.000 cells/mL. <br />Blue-green algae comprised about 98 percent of the <br />total phytoplankton density. The genus Microcystis <br />was absent from this sample, and the genus Aphanoth- <br />ece was the dominant algae and comprised about <br />95 percent of the blue-green algae. Aphanothece is <br />common to western ]alces and is very small in size. <br />This algae is not known to cause water-quality prob- <br />lems such as taste and odor and. as such, is not an indi- <br />cator of water quality. Little is known about this algae <br />because of its small size (Chadwick and Associates. <br />oral commun., 1988). Decomposition of the large <br />phytoplankton population present in October poten- <br />tially could deplete dissolved oxygen. <br /> <br />During the sampling period, chlorophyll a con- <br />centrations measured for site HEW2 at Lake Henry <br />ranged from 1.6 to 26.1 JlglL and averaged about <br />10 Jlg/L. The smallest concentrations were measured <br />on May I, and the largest concentrations were mea- <br />sured on October 6 (table 6). Concentrations of chlo- <br />rophyll a are used to determine trophic status. <br /> <br />Table 6. Concentrations of chlorophyll a for site HEW2 at <br />Lake Henry <br /> <br />(Jlg/L, micrograms per liter) <br /> <br />Sampling Sampling depth Chtorophyll a <br />data, 1987 (Ieet) (~gIL) <br />May 1 2.0 1.6 <br /> 8.0 4.2 <br />June 29 2.0 8.2 <br /> 8.0 7.1 <br />August 19 2.0 6.2 <br /> 4.0 8.0 <br />October 6 2.0 26.1 <br /> 5.0 19.0 <br /> <br />WATER-QUALtTY CHARACTERtSTtCS OF LAKE HENRY AND COMPARISON TO WATER.QUALlTY STANDARDS 17 <br />