Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(\ () 1 7 0 (}'Vet/and Mitigation <br /> <br />A- 11 <br /> <br />The total wetland impact of Monitor Sites, assuming they are all ultimately activated, is <br />0.44 acres. This impact will be mitigated at the Wetlands Mitigation Site before the <br />project commences operation. A "mitigation bank" will therefore already be in place for <br />the day the sites are activated. If the sites are never constructed, then the mitigation will <br />have been excess. <br /> <br />A.3.2.4 Access impacts <br /> <br />Construction road access will temporarily affect 0.15 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. <br />This impact will be mitigated by use of wood chips for road bedding, keeping turn- <br />arounds out of wetland areas, and reclaiming and restoring the areas after construction is <br />complete. Construction access will typically be needed for only a few days or weeks, so <br />the impact will be of very short duration. <br /> <br />A.3.3 <br /> <br />The Wetland Mitigation Site <br /> <br />In NEPA consultation, the Corps, EPA and USFWS indicated the need for a wetland <br />mitigation site to replace wetlands unavoidably lost through the bank stabilization <br />process. These agencies either recommended or approved use of the Corps' "WET-2" <br />computer model to identify lost wetland functions and values, and to help design a <br />mitigation site that would compensate for these losses. <br /> <br />HDR performed the requested analysis in 1990. Data input was based upon field <br />delineations of riparian wetlands conducted during 1989. The model tabulated functions <br />and values for the types of wetlands observed on the river, and allowed comparisons for <br />various mitigation site designs. Model results are reported in the FEIS, and are available <br />upon request. Ultimately, a mitigation site composed of 27% low prairie, 9% sedge <br />marsh, 18% willow emergent marsh, and 45% open/emergent marsh was recommended <br />and approved in the NEP A process. This balance replaced functions and values that <br />would potentially be lost by stabilizing banks of the Uncompahgre. <br /> <br />The selected mitigation site is within the existing Uncompahgre River floodplain, on land <br />already owned by the Applicants. It is adjacent to Bank Protection Sites 47, 48 and 49, <br />which between them represent about 25% of all stabilization-related wetland impacts. <br /> <br />The site will be monitored throughout the life of the project. Water supply will be from <br />existing groundwater, with supplemental supplies available from the Uncompahgre River <br />or the project tailrace. Additional information is included in the EIS. A plan view of the <br />mitigation site is included in the attached Figure 1. <br /> <br />The proposed site was 12 acres in size, originally with 8 acres devoted to compensating <br />for stabilization impacts. The site was approved in Interior's Record of Decision issued <br />in December, 1991. As bank stabilization impacts are now known to be much less than 8 <br />acres, the excess will be allocated to indirect (widening) impacts. Thus 4 acres will be <br />devoted to mitigating canal-bank wetland losses, 1.4 acres to direct stabilization impacts, <br />and 6.6 acres to indirect impacts. <br /> <br />AS Lateral Hydropower Project <br /> <br />July 2000 <br /> <br />." <br />:~ <br /><.1' ,. <br />