My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08712
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:10:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.700
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - Homestake Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/25/1974
Author
Black and Veatch
Title
Environmental Impact Report - Homestake Water Collection System Extension for Aurora and Colorado Springs with related documents Volume I
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I, - The Homestake Project is a trans-mountain water diversion <br />:i:system, It collects water from the western slope of the Contin- <br />I ':~!ental Divide and transfers it to the eastern slope for beneficial <br />:.; use by the Cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs, Rights to the <br />western slope water, taken from Eagle River tributaries in the <br />Colorado River Basin, were adjudicated by the Homestake Decree <br />in 1962. <br /> <br />I. SUMMARY <br /> <br />from the Project Area as shown on Exhibit 1. Alternative <br />Plans A, B, and C provide for gravity diversion of water; Plan 0 <br />combines gravity and pumping; and Plans E, F, F-1. and F-2 <br />combine gravity, storage, and pumping. Plans A through E con- <br />template construction by the Cities alone although Plan E would <br />require acquisition of a reservoir site from the Colorado River <br />Water Conservation District (CRWCD); Plans F through G would <br />require varying degrees of joint undertaking with the CRWCD <br />and/or the Denver Water Board (DWB). Both the CRWCD and <br />DWB own rights to Eagle River tributary waters although the <br />rights in both cases are junior to those of the Cities. <br /> <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The decree provided for two divisions in the collection system: <br />(1) the Eagle-Arkansas Division to collect waters from tributaries <br />generally on the east side of the Eagle River and (2) the Home- <br />stake Division to collect waters from tributaries on the west side <br />of the Eagle River. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Phase 1 of the Homestake Division collection facilities has been <br />completed, This phase is described herein in Section II.A, Phase <br />2 collection facilities under the Homestake Division are the sub- <br />ject of this environmental study and report. Phase 2 contemplates <br />development of East Cross Creek. Cross Creek, West Cross Creek, <br />Fall Creek, Whitney Creek, Peterson Creek. and other unnamed <br />min.o.r streams. These creek drainage basins comprise the Project <br />'_.oJ <br />Ar~ bounded generally by the Eagle River, the Continental <br />Di~, the Sawatch Range. and various ridge lines as shown on <br />E~it2. <br /> <br />To assist in evaluating impacts to the local and regional environ- <br />ment by the proposed project. a brief description of project <br />components and construction procedures is given in Section III, <br />and a description of existing environmental conditions and socio- <br />economic patterns is given in Section IV. To assess the environ- <br />mental impact on the Project Area of the various plans being <br />considered to extend the Homestake Collection System, an <br />environmental evaluation system was adopted. This system is <br />based on evaluation methods developed by a mu Itiagency task <br />force under the leadership of the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />(USBR). and adopted by the Bureau for planning and evaluation <br />of its water resource projects. In the USBR system. environ- <br />mental impacts are analyzed for the resource evaluation categor- <br />ies established by the Water Resources Council in its report <br />entitled "Proposed Principles and Standards for Planning Water <br />and Related Land Resources", This system is described in Sec- <br />tion V.A. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The project generally consists of facilities for (1) collection, <br />(2) upstream storage, (3) delivery. and (4) downstream storage of <br />water. Major components of the joint facilities for upstream <br />storage and delivery of water are complete, Each city has or will <br />d eve lop individual downstream storage facilities. Those for <br />Colorado Springs are essentially completed; whereas, Aurora is <br />presently considering additional storage sites. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Nine alternative plans investigated by the Cities are described in <br />Section II,B, of this report. Eight of these plans are contained <br />essentially within the Project Area. The ninth plan is remote <br /> <br />The environmental and socio-economic impacts which could <br />result from implementation of the various alternative plans are <br />detailed in Sections V.B and V,C. A listing of adverse environ- <br />mental effects, including the quantity of each resource which <br />would be relocated, modified, disrupted, or destroyed, is given in <br />Section V I. These adverse effects are identified here for the eight <br />alternative plans under consideration in the Project Area. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.