My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08706
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:10:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460
Description
Platte River-Platte Basin Endangered Species Issue
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/1/1997
Author
Lochhead-Robotham
Title
Platte River Agreement-Briefing Report-Platte River Endangered Species Program Agreement Between the States of Colorado Nebraska and Wyoming and the DOI
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.002546 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />On June 10, 1994, the Secretary of the Interior and the Governors of Colorado, Nebraska <br />and Wyoming entered into an agreement, called the "Platte River MOA," by which they <br />agreed to negotiate a program to conserve and protect the habitat of four species listed as <br />endangered under the Endangered Species Act (the "ESA"). Three bird species -- the <br />interior least tern, whooping crane, and piping plover -- use and depend on the Central <br />Platte River Valley between Lexington and Chapman, Nebraska. A fourth species -- the <br />pallid sturgeon -- is a fish that occupies the lower Platte River below its confluence with <br />the Elkhorn River in Nebraska. The land and water habitat in these areas has been altered <br />by a combination of events. including flow alteration as a result of upstream water <br />development and land uses in Nebraska, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Platte River MOA was premised on the belief that by developing a cooperative. <br />basinwide program to help these species, the three states and the Department of Interior <br />could accomplish more, and resources could be used more effectively, than could <br />otherwise be accomplished if the ESA's regulatory mechanisms were applied on a <br />permit-by-permit basis. The MOA also provided that the program would allow upstream <br />water development and use to continue. Governor Romer's support for the 1994 MOA <br />stemmed from his belief that only a basinwide program could effectively resolve the <br />escalating conflicts between water use and development and endangered species <br />protection that has come to characterize water facility permitting along Colorado's <br />rapidly growing Front Range. <br /> <br />Since that time, the states and Interior, with active participation. by water user and <br />environmental representatives, have been negotiating the program. (The environmental <br />representatives left the negotiations, but the Department of Interior has kept them abreast <br />of developments in the negotiation process.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After a long and sometimes difficult negotiation over the course of three years by their <br />representatives, the three Governors and the Secretary of the Interior have indicated their <br />formal agreement in principle (the entire Agreement is referred to as the "Program <br />Agreement"). Governor Romer's agreement in principle, as expressed in a letter to <br />Interior Secretary Babbitt dated May IS, 1997 (see attachment 2) is conditioned on any <br />remaining details being worked out by the negotiators. The state does not anticipate <br />major changes to the Program Agreement as outlined in this briefing, but recognizes that <br />substantial changes in the Program could occur over time as a result of several anticipated <br />developments, discussed more thoroughly below. In addition, the Governor has asked the <br />Department of Natural Resources to conduct public hearings as are necessary to explain <br />the agreement and seek input Finally, the Governor's agreement in principle recognizes <br />that no financial commitments have been made by the state to implement the program as <br />proposed. The Colorado Legislature must authorize and appropriate funds for any statc <br />involvement in the program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.