Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Carol DeAngelis <br />Fe,bruary 19, 2004 <br />Page 2 - <br /> <br />San Juan River Basin in New Mexico and Colorado, thus allowing the states to utilize. water <br />apportioned to them by the Colorado River and Upper Colorado River Basin compacts. <br />Progress toward recovery of the endangered fish species in the San Juan River also provides <br />compliance with the Act. <br /> <br />Yet, while the Draft Opinion at page 6 states that the proposed action to operate Navajo Dam <br />to meet the flow recommendations for the San Juan River adopted by the Program would <br />conserve endangered fish in the San Juan River, the Draft Opinion at page 1 states that the <br />Service has determined that the proposal is likely to adversely affect the Colorado pikeminnow <br />and razorback sucker and their critical habitats. The Draft Opinion also states that the <br />proposal is likely to adversely affect the southwestern willow flycatcher. The Service's <br />determinations also seem at odds with other portions of the Draft Opinion. It is nonsensical for <br />the Service to argue that Navajo Dam operations during 1963-1990 altered the natural <br />hydrograph of the San Juan River and consequently contributed to the decline of the three <br />species, and then to insinuate that changing the operation of the dam to mimic the pre-dam <br />natural hydrogaph would be detrimental to the species. The scope of the EIS and the <br />proposed action is the revised operation of Navajo Dam to meet the flow recommendations or <br />a reasonable alternative, not construction of the dam. <br /> <br />In any event, the Draft Opinion suggests that even with operating Navajo Dam to meet the flow <br />recommendations, low-velocity habitats needed for the two endangered fish species and the <br />southwestern willow flycatcher may decline due to insufficient high flows to create overbank <br />flooding, prevent channel narrowing, and form secondary channels. Given that high flows are <br />limited by Navajo Dam release capability and natural variations in available runoff, how would <br />the Service suggest that higher flows be created? The New Mexico State Engineer has been <br />preparing far active water resources management in the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico, <br />including the administration of water rights in the Basin. The State of New Mexico committed <br />to the Program that it would protect to the eldent of its authority flows released from Navajo <br />Dam for the benefit of the populations of endangered fish species in the San Juan River; but, <br />the State Engineer may not recognize or protect releases from the dam made in accordance <br />with the flow recommendations if the status of the current knowledge is that meeting the flaw <br />recommendations is not expected to benefit the species. <br /> <br />Recoverv Goal for Southwestern Willow Flvcatcher <br /> <br />The Draft Opinion Indicates that the southwestern willow flycatcher occurs seasonally and in <br />small numbers along the San Juan River throughout the action area in Colorado. New Mexico <br />and Utah. The San Juan River valley is near the northem end of the range of the <br />southwestern willow flycatcher, and it does not appear reasonable that Navajo Dam operations <br />should be affected by a questionable recovery goal of providing habitat far as many as 25 or <br />more territories of flycatcher when only one territory may exist within the action area. As the <br /> <br />OU1.)0j <br /> <br />BE5-, BIO/OIO.d E95-1 <br /> <br />1090B~Z016 NOI1JNnr ONVijD J'O V3ijV OJ Nij31S3M ij08.-WOJ, welZ:BO ~OOZ-60-Je~ <br />