Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />lEe Ic'j Mfu fJe.1.D-" b:ec ~ ) /c(83 <br />Forest Service foe <br />of dam on Poudre <br /> <br />By KAREN HINTON <br />Rocky Mountam News Northem Buteau <br /> <br />FORT COLLINS - The U.S. For- <br />est Service is opposed to the Grey <br />Mounbin-ldylwildc dam project on <br />the Poudre River and has recom- <br />mended designations that would <br />prot('('t most of the main stem. <br />If Congress follows the Forest <br />Service's recommendations and <br />designates 32 miles of the river as <br />"recreational" and 30 miles as <br />"wild and scenic," dam construction <br />would be prevented on the two <br />stretches of the river. <br />"Current information significant- <br />ly undercuts the long-proposed <br />Grey Mounlain-Idylwildc project"s <br />feasibility," the Forest Service said <br />in a recenl addendum to a 1982 <br />report on the Poudre. <br />"The Forest Service is opposed to <br />any main stem water developmenl <br />because of the unacceptable envi- <br />ronmental effects:' <br />The designations would protect <br />62 miles of the river roughly from <br />Poudre Park to Rustic and the Big <br />and Little South Forks. <br />The water project, proposed by <br />the Northern Colorado Water Con- <br />servancy District to supply water to <br />Greek'v and Fort Collins, would <br />capture spring runoff. The estimat- <br />ed cost is over $400 million <br />Many Larimer County residents <br />and several environmental groups <br />avidly support the designations as a <br />way to prohibit dams and commer- <br /> <br />cial development on the Poudre. <br />The Forest Service's sanction of <br />thi' designations is considered im- <br />portant to passing the necessary <br />legislation in Congress. <br />Rep. Hank Brown, R-Colo., will <br />introduce a bill making the designa- <br />tions if a committee he appointed <br />on the issue recommends it. said <br />Mike Fitzsimmons, an aide. <br />Environmental groups praised <br />the Forest Service's recommenda- <br />tion on the 62 miles, but they want <br />to add another 22 miles of the river <br />along private property. <br />"Eventually, people will begin <br />developing in the canyon - more <br />resorts, more mobile homes," said <br />Larry Metlhaff, project director of <br />the Colorado Open Space Council. <br />"Landowners will want to sell their <br />rights." <br />Metlhaff said the government <br />would rather "chop up the rivern <br />than pay landowners for easements. <br />Craig Rupp, regional forester for <br />the Forest Service, agreed the pri- <br />vate land was excluded because of <br />the casement costs. He said the des- <br />ignation stood a better chance of <br />receiving the blessing of the Office <br />of Management and Budget if the <br />pri1...ate land was left out. <br />Rupp said slate and local govern- <br />ments could pass laws to regulate <br />development on the private lands <br />and thus protect the river's scenic <br />quality. <br />The private property extends IS <br />miles above Indian Meadows and 7 <br />miles below Poudre Park.. <br /> <br />0861 <br />