My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08666
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08666
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:09:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.I
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/19/1982
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement: Water Allocations & Water Service Contracting - Central Arizona Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />C~ <br />i'"' <br />Co: <br /> <br />, c non-Indian M&I uses. The Andrus Modified for M&I Alternative (Alternative 4), <br />provi des that duri ng shortages, 25 percent of the Indi an i rri gati on amount <br />would be reduced until exhausted prior to a pro-rata reduction of the <br />remaining Indian irrigation and tribal homeland amounts with all non-Indian <br />M&I uses (no 510,000 acre-foot cap). The Secretary's proposed Indian <br />allocation is a combination of these two shortage distribution formulas. Like <br />the Andrus allocation, the proposed shortage distribution maintains the <br />510,000 acre-foot cap on non-Indian M&I use, as well as the 10 percent <br />reduction in Indian irrigation use for the 11 tribes or communities affected <br />by water servi ce contracts executed in December 1980 (all except the Gil a <br />River Indian Reservation). However, like Alternative 4 (Andrus Modified for <br />M&I Use), the Gila River Indian Reservation's allocation would be reduced by <br />25 percent prior to the pro-rata reduction. <br /> <br />Like Alternative 4, the Proposed Action will require effluent <br />exchanges where feasible and consistent with contract provisions. However, in <br />addit i on to the exchanges with the Salt Ri ver and Gi 1 a Ri ver Reservati ons <br />described for Alternative 4, the analysis for the Proposed Action also assumes <br />exchanges between the city of Tucson and the San Xavier Indian Reservation. <br /> <br />III. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />A. General Project Area <br /> <br />1 Geography and Climate <br /> <br />The CAP service area is generlly described as consisting of <br />Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties, an area which includes metropolitan Phoenix <br />and Tucson, as well as most of the irrigated agricultural land of Arizona. <br />Fewer than 20 of the 134 entiti es recorrnnended for all ocati ons by the six <br />alternatives are found outside this three-county area. <br /> <br />f) <br /> <br />The project area lies within the Gila River watershed in the <br />Basin and Range physiographic province of the Southwest. The Basin and Range <br />Provi nce is characteri zed by mounta in cha i ns and all uvi ated valleys. <br />Elevations range from about 500 feet to over 10,000 feet. Most of the project <br />service area lies between elevations of 900 feet and 2,400 feet. <br /> <br />The climate of this area is characterized by long, hot summers <br />and short, mild winters; low annual rainfall; low relative humidity; high <br />evaporation; and a high percentage of days with sunshine. The annual <br />preci pi tati on averages about 8 inches. Temperatures vary, but summer <br />temperatures above 100 degrees are common, and winter temperatures usually do <br />not exceed 65 to 70 degrees. <br /> <br />Q~'l <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.