Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lr.. <br />c <br />00 <br />.. C\1 <br /> <br />'. C <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Alternative Actions <br /> <br />Projected CAP water deliveries to each category of use under each of <br />the alternatives are summarized in Table 1. To ascertain the effect and <br />significance of the different allocations, an estimate of total water <br />deliveries was made for each entity. <br /> <br />1. Indian Tribes <br /> <br />The 10 Indian reservations range in size from the 2.8 million- <br />acre Papago Indian Reservation to the 85-acre Tonto Apache Indian Reservation. <br />Their geographical setting is diverse, from low desert to land over <br />timberline. <br /> <br />While in excess of 90,000 acres have been developed for <br />irrigation on the 10 reservations, it is estimated that 50,100 acres of land <br />are under irrigation at the present time. An additional 28,149 acres of land <br />could be developed for irrigation under the CAP action alternatives. The CAP <br />action alternatives would result in new irrigation development for all tribes <br />except the Yavapai-Prescott. Their allocation would be used in implementing <br />portions of the tribe's development plan. <br /> <br />New delivery systems will generally have to be constructed to <br />transport water to the reservations' irrigation project. Although the final <br />design and location is not set, most systems would be open concrete-lined <br />ditches, and as necessary would include siphons and pumping stations. <br /> <br />Much of the irrigation use of CAP water on Indian reservations <br />would take place on lands previously developed for irrigation. However, some <br />of these lands were subsequently abandoned and have reverted to native <br />vegetation, and the redevelopment of this acreage would cause wildl ife habitat <br />losses. It is also possible that the redevelopment of these lands could have <br />adverse impacts on cultural resources that may remain partially intact. <br /> <br />In all cases there will be a beneficial economic impact to <br />tribes with any of the CAP action alternatives. Alternatives 3, 4, 5 and 6 <br />provide an added significant benefit to the tribes by assuring a relatively <br />stable and predictable water .supply for domestic and economic development on <br />Indian reservations. <br /> <br />By using these additional water supplies from CAP, the tribes <br />can supplement the irrigation of the 90,000 acres of land developed on the <br />10 reservations and/or develop about 28,000 acres of undeveloped land. Eight <br />reservations may also use the allocated CAP water supplies for industrial or <br />recreati ona 1 development. In any case, additi ona 1 jobs woul d be generated, <br />per capi ta income woul d be increased, and the 1 ife styl e of the reservati on <br />residents would be upgraded. <br /> <br />~~:~~: <br /> <br />13 <br />