My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08666
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08666
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:09:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.I
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/19/1982
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement: Water Allocations & Water Service Contracting - Central Arizona Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />....-4 <br />I~ <br />c <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />6. Land Subsidence and Earth Fissures <br /> <br />:,' <br />:~ <br /> <br />Ground-water withdrawal has resulted in water level declines <br />throughout the area. These water-level declines have caused land subsidence <br />and earth fissures. Subsidence occurs through compaction of the sediments in <br />and below dewatered zones. Earth fissures or cracks generally occur around <br />the periphery of basins with ground-water declines and subsidence. The <br />greatest water-level declines have been in the basins surrounding Eloy, <br />Pi cacho, Ma ri copa, and Stanfi e 1 din Pi na 1 County; and Queen Creek, Mesa, <br />Scottsdale, Luke Air Force Base, and Sun City in Maricopa County. The use of <br />CAP water will cause the water level to decline less rapidly or stabilize. <br />This will decrease the amount of subsidence that will take place and decrease <br />the occurrence of fissures. In areas where the water level is stabilized, <br />subsidence will slow and gradually stop. <br /> <br />The water-level change predictions for the various water- <br />allocation alternatives in Appendix F indicate that the water level will <br />continue to decline to some degree in most areas. Correspondingly, subsidence <br />will conti nue to some degree also. The di fferences between the plans with <br />respect to subsidence are differences in distribution of the subsidence that <br />will take place. All of the plans will considerably reduce the amount of <br />subsidence that will take place without CAP. <br /> <br />I'; <br />...):. <br />.. <br />.<; <br />'0- <br />% <br /> <br />(' <br /> <br />'.: <br /> <br />" <br />- <br />'.~ <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Soils and Irrigated Agriculture <br /> <br />"; <br />., <br /> <br />The valley soils of the project area are generally highly <br />suited to irrigated agriculture. A land classification completed in 1972 by <br />the Bureau found the majority of the farmland to be arable and irrigable under <br />Bureau specifications. The Department of Agriculture has designated nearly <br />all of the irrigated farmland in the project area as prime. Under any <br />alternative allocation, approximately 100,000 acres of prime farmland on the <br />Salt River Project and about 34,000 off the Salt River Project would be <br />converted to urban use to accommodate population growth. In response to each <br />alternative allocation, additional prime farmland ranging from 1,800 to 7,000 <br />acres would be retired to obtain ground-water supplies for M&I use. This <br />acreage to be urbanized over the 50-year project period represents about a 15 <br />percent decrease from the estimated 1 million acres having a recent history of <br />irrigation. However, this general level of urbanization would occur under any <br />of the allocation alternatives. The maximum difference in estimated <br />urbanization of prime farmland among the allocation alternatives is 532 acres. <br /> <br />:.: <br /> <br />Colorado River water is suitable for growing salt-sensitive <br />crops on soils have good leaching capability or for growing moderately <br />to 1 erant crops on soil s wi th poor 1 each i ng capabi 1 ity (soil s havi ng both <br />capabilities are found in the project area). Since the CAP water supply from <br />the Colorado River is not estimated to approach the lower salinity limit for <br />sustained irrigation, no significant adverse effect on crop production is <br />anticipated. Likewise, it is not anticipated that irrigated agriculture on <br />the Salt River and Gila River Reservations would suffer adverse effects as a <br />result of subst i tuti ng treated effl uent for CAP water, although the soc i a 1 <br />acceptance of tribal members would likely not be obtained. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.