Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0il29J8 <br /> <br />Chapter 1 <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Figure 1.2: Status of Completed Wild and Scenic Rivers Studies, as of September 1986 <br /> <br />Studies completed <br /> <br />River found eligible? <br /> <br />River recommended <br />tor inclusiona by <br />the President? <br /> <br />River now in <br />national system? <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />Ves <br /> <br />No <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Ves <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />Ves <br /> <br /> <br />Ves <br /> <br /> <br />"Five fiver studies were transmitted to the Congress without recommendations <br /> <br />o Three rivers not recommended for congressional deSIgnation have come into the system by <br />Secretarial deSIgnation under section 2(a) (Ii). <br />C Part of the Obed River study corndor was designated by the Congress bel ore the study was <br />transmitted by the President. TIle Presrdenllater recommended against congressional deSignation <br />01 the remaming Sludy segment. <br />d This includes the Lower Sf Croix RIver. which was added 10 the system by a combination 01 <br />congressional designation (1972) and Secretarial designation under section 2(a) (il) In 1976. <br />Source: Departments of the Intenor and Agriculture records as compiled by GAO <br /> <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />GAO/RCED-87.39 Wild and Scenic Rivers <br />