My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08641
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:08:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.100.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/26/1999
Title
Agenda Item 13e - July 26-27 1999 Board Meeting - Colorado River Basin issues - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Triennial Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 0 <br />co <br />co <br /> ,..... <br />1 <br />';1 <br />, <br />1 <br />] <br />1 <br />, <br />I <br />] <br />'] <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />~ <br />.1 <br />\~ <br />i <br />J <br />J <br />J <br />'l <br />I <br />.... <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Section 303 of the Clean Water Act requires that water quality standards be reviewed from <br />time to time, but at least once during each three-year period. Accordingly, the seven-state Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Forum (Forum) has reviewed the existing state-adopted and <br />Environmental p:rotection Agency (EP A)-approved water quality standards for salinity consisti)lg <br />of numeric criteria and a plan of implementation for salinity control for the Colorado River System. <br />Since the issuance of the 1996 Review, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has initiated <br />development of a new model to analyze the Colorado River System, including salinity. The model <br />development is not yet completed, and new salinity projections are not available for this Review. <br />Projections developed for the 1996 Review are used in this Review. This 1999 Review updates <br />funding imd salinity control component implementation requirements following 1999. Also, since <br />the 1996 Review, federal legislation has been implemented which allows the Basin states to cost <br />share up-front in;both Reclamation's Basinwide Program and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's <br />EQI:e program. This has brought a new and important source of funding to the program and has <br />accelerated the rate of implementation of salinity control measures. Federal authorization given by <br />Congress in 199(i has already allowed for the addition of $6,476,000 to the effort. The Forum's <br />recommendations are to be submitted to each of the Basin states for consideration at a public hearing <br />prior to adoption. <br /> <br />The Fonlm recommends no change in the numeric salinity criteria at the three stations <br />located on the lower mainstem of the Colorado River. The numeric criteria at these stations will <br />remain: <br /> <br />,.< <br />,;', <br /> <br />",'4. <br /> <br />Station <br /> <br />Salinity in mg/V <br /> <br />Below Hoover Dam <br />Below Parker Dam <br />At Imperial Dam <br /> <br />723- <br />747 <br />879 <br /> <br />The plan of implementation as set forth in this Review is designed to meet the objective of <br />maintaining the' salinity concentrations at or below the numeric criteria while the Basin states <br />continue to develpp their compact-apportioned waters. The plan is based on maintaining the numeric <br />criteria under a long-term mean water supply of 15 million acre-feet armually at Lee Ferry, the <br />Compact Point. The Forum recommends that the plan of implementation described in this report <br />be carried out. The plan of implementation includes: <br /> <br />1. Completion of Reclamation, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and U.S. <br />Department of Agriculture (USDA) salinity control measures to the extent that each <br />umt remains viable and appropriately cost-effective. <br /> <br />IF!ow-weighted average annual salinity. <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />, :~ <br />~ .,ooL _ , ,,~~~',~;ll <br />_ _ \~, _ ~, ~~",W:"~ :: ,;::; ~_!!! <br /> <br />. .~ , <br /> <br />...- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.