Laserfiche WebLink
<br /><=> <br />o <br />1".:> <br />o <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Controi <br />Program Measures In Place <br /> <br />800,000 <br /> <br />600,000 , <br /> <br />Ul <br />5 400,000 " <br />I-'- <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />200,000 , <br /> <br />Figure 1-1 <br /> <br />Overview of Standards <br /> <br />The Forum proposed, the states adopted, and the EP A approved water quality standards in <br />1975, including numeric criteria and a plan of implementation, to control salinity increases. The <br />standards require that a plan be developed which will maintain the flow-weighted average arumal <br />salinity at or below the 1972 levels while the Basin states continue to develop their compact- <br />apportioned water supply, The Forum selected three stations on the mainstem of the lower Colorado <br />River as being appropriate points to measure the salinity ofthe Colorado River, These stations are <br />located at the following points on the Colorado River; (1) below Hoover Dam; (2) below Parker <br />Dam; and (3) at Imperial Dam. Numeric criteria were established for these points as required by the <br />1974 regulation, A plan of implementation was also developed in 1975 by the Forum and <br />participating federal agencies as part of the standards, It was designed to ensure compliance with <br />the numeric criteria for salinity, The numeric criteria and plan of implementation are further <br />described in Chapters 3 and 4 of this Review, During each triennial review, the numeric criteria are <br />reviewed and the plan of implementation is updated to ensure continuing compliance with the <br />standards, <br /> <br />The Colorado River water quality standards for salinity, and the approach taken by the Basin <br />states in complying, are unique, The Forum relied on the Basin states' projections of use of compact- <br />apportioned waters. The salinity projections are based on the long-term mean water supply of <br />15 million acre-feet per year, The plan of implementation is revised as necessary to ensure <br />compliance with the standards, <br /> <br />1-4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />