My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.950
Description
Section D General Studies - General Water Studies
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/1/1989
Author
John U. Carlson
Title
The Colorado River Compact - A Breeding Ground for International National and Interstate Controversies
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c. Lower Basin Uses in Excess of Its Apportionment <br />The Lower Basin's use of water from the <br />Colorado River system was estimated at approximately 10.6 <br />m.a.f. in 1980. This is far in excess of its Article <br />III(a) and (b) apportionment of 8.5 m.a.f. The Upper <br />Basin contends that under the terms of Article III (c) <br />this excess use constitutes surplus and that accordingly, <br />the Upper Basin's duty to supply a portion of the Mexican <br />Treaty obligation should be diminished to the extent of <br />the excess use. Thus, in a year such as 1980, the Upper <br />Basin would have no duty to supply any water under <br />Article III(c). since the common belief at the time the <br />1922 Compact was negotiated was that the flow of the <br />Colorado River was adequate to satisfy all needs, there <br />is virtually nothing in the record of the compact <br />meetings or elsewhere that either confirms or refutes the <br />Upper Basin's contention. The Upper Basin's position <br />would seem to be contrary to the technical reading of <br />Article III(c). However, its underlying rationale <br />conforms to the intent of the compact commissioners to <br />equalize the Article III(a) apportionments to each basin <br />and to match the Upper Basin's delivery obligation <br />specified in Article III (d) to the amount of those <br />apportionments. <br /> <br />-23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.