My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.950
Description
Section D General Studies - General Water Studies
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/1/1989
Author
John U. Carlson
Title
The Colorado River Compact - A Breeding Ground for International National and Interstate Controversies
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />The problem is often referred to as "the Gila River <br />problem." Substantial quantities of water originate in <br />the tributaries of the Colorado River located in the <br />Lower Basin, principally the Gila River, which discharge <br />into the Colorado Rover at points below Lee I s Ferry. <br />These tributary waters have been estimated to range <br />at quantities between 2 m.a.f. to 3.5 m.a.f. annually. <br />Arizona has reached a very high, if not full, state of <br />development with respect to the Gila River waters. To <br />the extent these tributary waters are included in the <br />accounting of "surplus" waters, it would materially <br />increase the usable water supply in the Upper Basin as <br />the Upper Basin would be freed of a duty to release water <br />at Lee's Ferry for satisfaction of the Mexican Treaty <br />obligation. <br />It appears from an examination of the 1922 compact <br />and the Boulder canyon Project Act of 1928 that the Lower <br />Basin tributaries must be included in the determination <br />of whether a surplus exists. Resolution of 1) whether <br />the Upper Basin has a duty to contribute water toward the <br />Mexican Treaty obligation when the Lower Basin's uses <br />exceed 8.5 m.a.f. and the Lower Basin's uses do not reach <br />7.5 m.a.f. and 2) if the answer to number one is yes, <br />whether the Upper Basin must also supply additional water <br /> <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.