My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08611
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/9/1995
Author
S. Ute Grassroots Co
Title
Alternatives to the Animas-La Plata Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ALTERNATIYES TO THE ANIMAS-LAPLATA I'ROJECT <br /> <br />PROPOSED BY THE SOUTHERN UTE GR4SSROOTS COMMITTEE <br /> <br />The Southern Ute Grassroots Committee believes that development of the Animas- <br />LaPlata Project (ALP) as presently contemplated is not in the best interest ofthe Tribe, It will not <br />fulfill the promises of the ] 986 Water Rights Settlement Agreement. The financial obligations it <br />could impose on the Tribe out weigh any benefits the Tribe would obtain, It is clear that many <br />non-Indians in the area stand to benefit from the ALP, and it is clear that the ALP will damage the <br />environment. What is not clear is how the ALP, as presently configured, is a wise and fair <br />exchange for our historic water rights. To date, there has been no meaningful opponunity for <br />Tribal members to explore and understand what alternatives exist to the ALP, We urge in the <br />strongest terms that the ALP be placed on hold until all ALP alternatives, including non- <br />development, have been fully and fairly reviewed by interested Tribal members, other project <br />panicipants, the interested public and the peninent government agencies. <br /> <br />The Federal Government has acknowledged that the ALP is wasteful. It will cost <br />taxpayers almost $700 million - more than the combined benefits (objectively calculated) it would <br />provide to all concerned. The ALP's environmental problems make it impossible for the project to <br />be completed on time or in a way that fulfills the promises made to our people. <br /> <br />These circumstances afford our Tribe two options under the] 986 Settlement Agreement. <br /> <br />L We can waive the delays and reduced benefits and accept something less than promised, at <br />whatever date it becomes available. or <br /> <br />2, We can follow the path of our Nonhern Ute cousins and seek an alternative settlement <br />that does not require development of the ALP. <br /> <br />We believe that an alternative water rights settlement, derived fror'l possibilities like those <br />described below, would better serve the Southern Ute People, The following ideas are consistent <br />with workable ALP alternatives that exist for most other project panicipants, They offer great <br />potential savings to both federal and four corners area taxpayers, And, they are kinder to our <br />sacred lands and water. However, these are just our initial ideas and suggestions made to us by <br />expens we have contacted, More and perhaps better ideas will surface when the process behind <br />the ALP is opened to full and honest alternative analysis, <br /> <br />l. Water for Specific Tribal roIeeds <br /> <br />The package could include: <br /> <br />. Financial and technical assistance to develop, rehabilitate and enhance reseT\'ation <br />groundwater and existing surface water resources, What potential exists to use clean aquifers <br />under Tribal lands for water storage~ A survey is needed to identif)' these opponunities, their <br />potential and cost. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.