My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08608
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:07:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.600
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/18/1992
Title
Monitoring and Evaluation - Wildlife Report - Fiscal Year 1991
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />......... <br />~~;:-~ <br />......~ <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />....:1. <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />IJlTRODUCTI:OH: <br /> <br />Wildlife upland and wetland habitat is being monitored <br />at selected sites in the KcElmo Creek Salinity Control Unit. <br />These sites (as outlined in the KcElmo Creek ErS) include 15 <br />contracts (farm units) selected each year from the first <br />three years of the Salinity Program for a total of 45 sites. <br />Habitat changes are presently being tracked for all salinity <br />contracts to measure habitat quality and quantity (for <br />existing, planned and applied conditions). <br /> <br />B. OBJBCTI:VES: <br /> <br />The McElmo Creek Salinity control Unit, a once xeric <br />basin with irrigated agriculture introduced 75 years ago, <br />contains extensive wetlands associated with over-irrigation, <br />seepage (canal, lateral and ditch) losses, and accumulation <br />(perching) in geological depressions. As irrigation systems <br />and management practices become more efficient water supply <br />to these wetlands will be diminished. Losses of upland <br />habitat will occur in order to facilitate these new systems. <br />(such as incidental field squaring, ditch removal, etc.). <br />Evaluations will be made to measure the impacts of salinity <br />project implementation to wetland and upland wildlife <br />" habitat and to also.assess the effectiveness of voluntary <br />':-".,': actions by landowners to replace or mitigate for any habitat <br />losses attributed to irrigation system improvement. These <br />evaluations will be conducted to document existing, planned <br />(projected) and applied conditions for every contract. <br /> <br />C. METHODOLOGY: <br /> <br />.:~ ; <br /> <br />Habitat quality will be determined by using the u.s. <br />Fish and wildlife service Habitat Evaluation Procedures <br />(HEP). Habitat data gathered from individual salinity <br />contracts and randomly selected monitoring sites will be <br />used to calculate Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) values for <br />selected wildlife species. The HSI is a numerical index <br />rating which measures habitat quality for wildlife species <br />on a scale of zero (0) to one (1). The value attained <br />reflects the potential of a habitat type to support a <br />specific wildlife species. (HSI models basically look at the <br />life requisites, food, water and cover, of a species and <br />their seasonable availability to that species.). An HSI <br />value of 1.0 implies an area has the greatest potential to <br />support the selected wildlife species, while a value of .1 <br />denotes significantly lower potential (one-tenth of <br />potential to support that species) for that species to exist <br />in the area. <br /> <br />":~. ~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.