Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) <br /> <br />5.0 MODELING OF THE EXISTING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS <br />5.1 INTRODUCTION <br />5.2 SELECTION OF MODEL <br />5.3 DESCRIPTION OF RIBSIM <br />5.4 MODIFICATION OF MODEL LOGIC <br />5.5 GENERATION OF MODELING INPUT DATA <br />5.5.1 Study Period for Modeling <br />5.5.2 Network Generation <br />5.5.3 Flow Base Generation <br />5.6 GENERATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA <br />5.6.1 Transbasin Imports from Mountain Diversions <br />5.6.2 Imports from the Big Thompson River Basin <br />5.6.3 Reservoir Evaporation and Seepage <br />5.6.4 C-BT and Windy Gap Deliveries <br />5.6.5 Ditch Losses, Efficiencies, and Return Flows <br />5.6.6 Pumping from Alluvial Wells <br />5.6.7 South Platte Calls <br />5.6.8 Incorporation of Ground Water Into the Model <br />5.6.9 Contribution of Precipitation to Basin Water Supply <br />5.7 CALIBRATION OF THE MODEL <br />5.7.1 Calibration Steps <br />5.7.2 Comparison of Modeled vs. Actual Flows <br />5.8 FORT COLLINS DROUGHT STUDY VS. MODELED STUDY PERIOD <br />5.9 REGIONAL HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT <br />5.9.1 Diversions <br />5.9.2 Transbasin Imports <br />5.9.3 C-BT Imports <br />5.9.4 Ground Water Use <br />5.9.5 Return Flows <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />5- 1 <br />5- 1 <br />5- 1 <br />5- 2 <br />5- 3 <br />5- 4 <br />5- 4 <br />5- 4 <br />5- 8 <br />5- 9 <br />5- 9 <br />5- 9 <br />5- 9 <br />5-10 <br />5-11 <br />5-12 <br />5-13 <br />5-13 <br />5-14 <br />5-15 <br />5-15 <br />5-16 <br />5-18 <br />5-19 <br />5-19 <br />5-20 <br />5-21 <br />5-21 <br />5-21 <br /> <br />, <br />