Laserfiche WebLink
<br />215:5 <br /> <br />Tobie 3 <br /> <br />CAPACITY AND SURFACE STORAGE OF MAJOR <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS <br />(Thousands of Acre-feet) <br /> <br />Uppu BaJill <br /> <br />Lake PowelL _ _ _u, u_ _ _. <br />Flaming Gorge__ _ __ _ u ___ <br />N.1vajo___~_ _ _ ___ _. __ -__ <br />Blue Mesa__ ___U___Ud <br />FQntenelle___ <br /> <br />Cross <br />Capacity <br />27.000 <br />3,789 <br />1,709 <br />941 <br />H5 <br /> <br />Subtotal. <br /> <br />.4aiv( <br />SlOrab~ CJiui;gr <br />UJab/r End of During <br />Capacity Srpt, 196(i } 'tar <br />25.002 6,423 - 43 <br />3,749 2,454 - 21 <br />1,514 314 - 236 <br />830 192 + 192 <br />145 H + 6 <br /> <br />33,784 3U60 <br /> <br />LOWtr BaJl"1 <br />Lake Mead_ _ _ 29,827 <br />Laker\"loha\'e_~__________ 1,818 <br />L.k, Ha..,""... 648 <br /> <br />SubtotaL __________ 32,293 <br /> <br />Total Both Basins- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Mi,On <br /> <br />9,427 - 102 <br /> <br />27,207 15,004 + 2% <br />1,810 1,387 + 10 <br />619 565 + I5 <br />29,636 16,956 + 321 <br />61,096 26,31\3 + 219 <br /> <br />PLATE 4 <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS <br />STORAGE AND CAPACITY <br /> <br />so <br /> <br />.0 <br /> <br />so <br /> <br />'0 <br /> <br />,01 <br />,r-'o <br /> <br />o <br />19JO <br /> <br /> <br />--+ <br /> <br />S., <br /> <br />LAICE MEAD <br />LAKE PO"'ELL <br />FLAMING GORGE <br />NAVAJO <br />SLUE MESA <br />FONTENELLE <br /> <br />2.7.2 <br /> <br />ACTIVE CAPACITY <br /> <br />LAKE MEAD STORAGE ONL'r'-- <br /> <br /> <br />)940 <br />WATER <br /> <br />Ig~O <br />YEAR <br /> <br />1960 <br /> <br />1966 <br /> <br />Plate 4 shows the combined active surface <br />storage of Lake Mead and the Colorado River <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />Storage Project reservoirs for the period 1935- <br />1966. Lake Mohave and Lake Havasu are not <br />included because they are operated at relatively <br />constant levels. In addition to surface storage, <br />water is absorbed in the areas adjacent to the <br />reservoirs. At Lake Powell, this absorption or <br />bank storage was esrimarco to be about 3, l 00,- <br />000 acre-feet as of the end of water vear 1966, <br />or 37 percent of the gross surface storage. <br />As can be seen in Plate 4, the low runoff for <br />1966 has delayed initial filling of major basin <br />reservoirs to the combined rated head capacity. <br />Plate 5 shows the changes in contents of the <br />major mainstream reservoirs during the 1966 <br />water year. <br />Article I1I(d) of the Colorado River Com- <br />pact states that the States of the Upper Division <br />will not cause the flow of the river at Lee <br />Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of <br />75,000,000 acre-feet for any period of ten con- <br />secutive years. In the past four years the filling <br />of the Colorado River Storage Project reservoirs <br />has resulted in a total flow at Lee F errv of onlY <br />23,655,000 acre-feet as shown below: . . <br />Fio'/,;,' at Lee Fern <br />e A ere-Feet) . <br />2,520,000 <br />2,427,000 <br />10,835,000 <br />7,873,000 <br /> <br />Wafer Year <br />1962-63 .......... ,,""n"""''',,''' <br />1963-64 ...................."""..." <br />1964-65 ............"" """',"".,,'" <br />1965-66 <br /> <br />Toral ...."".."".."" 23,655,000 <br />4-Year Average ...".. 5,914,000 <br /> <br />In the next six years it will be necessan' to <br />release 51,345,000 'acre-feet at Lee Ferrv ,ir an <br />average of 8,557,500 acre-feet a year i;l order <br />that delivery will total 75,000,000 acre-feet for <br />the 10-year period 1963-1972. <br /> <br />Uses and Losses <br /> <br />Depletions in the Upper Basin arc not all <br />measured. The Bureau of Reclamation computes <br />irrigation depletions by applying a unit rate to <br />an estimated acreage. The unit rate is derived <br />for each year by adjusting the estimated long- <br />time average to vary with the annual runoff, <br />indicating uses greater than average in years of <br />high runoff and less than average in years of <br />low runoff. This type of adjustment is ques- <br />tionable for application to present development <br />because of the increasing amount of storage reg- <br />ulation available to supplement low runoff. In- <br /> <br />.t~ <br />') <br />