Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3436 <br /> <br />Fund or other sources. The project would deplete the flow of the river <br />by about 63,000 acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />Middle Park <br /> <br />The Middle Park project would develop about 67,000 acre-feet of <br />water for the irrigation of about 9,885 acres of supplemental service <br />land and 22,945 acres of full service land. The project would also pro- <br />vide benefits to fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and possibly <br />flood control. It would cost about $10,245,000, all of which has tenta- <br />tively been allocated to irrigation. The irrigators and local interests <br />would repay about $1,985,000 of the cost and the remaining $8,260,000 <br />would be repaid from the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund or other sources. <br />The project would deplete the flows of the Colorado River by about 29,000 <br />acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />Other Potential Developments <br /> <br />In-basin municipal and industrial water projects <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Several potential municipal and industrial water developments within <br />the Colorado River Basin in Colorado are being considered by private in- <br />terests, communities, and the Colorado River Water Conservation District <br />for oil shale developments and other potential industries. The projects <br />are: (1) Phillips-Wheeler project (Humble Oil) which would deplete the <br />flow of Colorado River by about 10,000 acre-feet annually; (2) Flattops <br />project, previously considered by the Bureau of Reclamation and now the <br />subject of separate studies, one being made jointly by the Colorado River <br />Water Conservation District and the Humble Oil Company and the other by <br />the Rocky Mountain Power Company; the project would deplete the flows of <br />the Colorado River by about 30,000 acre-feet annually; (3) Red Cliffs <br />project, also under consideration by the Colorado River Water Conserva- <br />tion District, would deplete the flows of the river by about 20,000 acre- <br />feet annually; (4) Azure project, Colorado River Water Conservation Board, <br />would deplete the .flow of the Colorado River by about 7,000 acre-feet <br />annually; (5) expansions of the existing Hayden REA thermal powerplant <br />would deplete the flows of the river by an additional 8,000 acre-feet an- <br />nually as a result of use of water for cooling purposes; (6) Rangely proj- <br />ect, sponsored by the Rangely community in the lower White River area, <br />would deplete the river by about 5,000 acre-feet annually; and (7) Una <br />Reservoir on Colorado River near the tO~l of Grand Valley, Colorado River <br />Water Conservation Board, would deplete the flow of the Colorado River by <br />about 30,000 acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />In-basin irrigation projects <br /> <br />Potential long-range irrigation projects in western Colorado, in- <br />vestigated in rough reconnaissance scope by the Bureau of Reclamation, <br />are listed on the following page. <br /> <br />8 <br />