My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08527
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:03:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.382
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations-Entities - Delores Water Conservation District
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/1/2001
Author
BOR
Title
Final Environmental Assessment - Delores Project Carriage Contract
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OO~~70 <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />economy. Tourism, general recreation, and energy industries should not be affected by <br />impleI?-enting the Carriage Contract. <br /> <br />McPhee Reservoir is an important recreation site in the area and fish and wildlife-related <br />recreation is important in many areas of the county. Fishing is the primary recreation activity <br />occurring on the reach of the Dolores River downstream from McPhee Dam. Reclamation and <br />the DWCD also manage water in excess of Dolores Project needs to provide spill water for <br />rafting opportunities downstream from McPhee Dam (starting at the Bradfield Bridge) in the <br />spring. The boating season is dependent on water that is spilled from McPhee and thus the <br />length and quality of the rafting season varies from year to year with runoff into the reservoir. <br />Spill water is water in excess of that needed to fill the reservoir in the spring. <br /> <br />The 6,000-8,000 acre-feet of water has historically been diverted from the Dolores Basin. During <br />the last 10 years, this has happened at least three tinoes. In years that it stayed in McPhee <br />Reservoir and runoff conditions caused McPhee to spill the following spring, the water could <br />expand the spill period or the magnitude of the spill used by rafting. (Six thousand - eight <br />thousand acre-feet could provide 3-4 days of rafting during years when spill occurred.) In the <br />year 2000, the water was diverted from the basin, so there would have been no benefit to rafting. <br />If the Carriage Contract is not executed, MVIC is anticipated to find other uses for the water as <br />discussed previously under the No Action alternative, so it appears the water will not likely be <br />available to supplement rafting flows under any alternative, including No Action. <br /> <br />Cultural Resources <br /> <br />Southwestern Colorado contains numerous archeological sites dating to both the prehistoric and <br />historic periods. Some of the highest densities of cultural remains in the Southwest occur within <br />Montezuma County. These cultural remains have been the subject of archeological research for <br />many years. Based on the previous research near Pleasant View, a majority of sites in that <br />immediate area are assignable to the Ancestral Puebloan culture and have been dated to <br />approximately AD 700 to AD 1100. This time frame, known as the Basketrnaker III and Pueblo <br />[-11 Periods, accounts for the greatest prehistoric occupation in the general area. Sites dating both <br />before and after this time frame also occur, but in lesser numbers. <br /> <br />Previous surveys along the Dolores Project canals and laterals indicate that an average of five to <br />six sites per linear mile can be expected in the Carriage Contract area. With the anticipation of <br />II miles of new DWCD piped laterals, it is expected that 55 to 66 sites will be encountered by <br />the surveyors along the new DWCD distribution system. Additional sites will likely be found in <br />other areas of ground disturbance. <br /> <br />The proposed Dolores Carriage Contract meets the definition of an undertaking in 36 CFR Part <br />800.16 and does not qualify for the exemption from consultation criterion in 36 CFR Part 800.3. <br />Reclamation, as the lead Federal agency for the Carriage Contract, must therefore comply with <br />the National Historic Preservation Act (NHP A) for this undertaking. Reclamation expects <br />impacts to occur from ground disturbing activities associated with the construction, use and <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.