Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />002545 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Table 2-11 Average Monthly Flows for the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek <br /> <br /> Dischoroelcfsl <br /> Arkansas River Fountoin Creek <br /> Abo,," Pueblo Moffot Street Neor Pueblo Neor Pueblo <br />Month Go~e Gope Gope Gope <br />Januarv 138 87 317 67 <br />Februarv 205 156 284 72 <br />March 373 314 243 69 <br />Aoril 676 591 387 93 <br />Mav 1,157 1,140 1,086 202 <br />June 2,333 2,318 2,\32 \49 <br />July 1,658 1.660 1.413 85 <br />AU2:ust 1,026 929 919 . 132 <br />Se;;tembcr 476 379 427 50 <br />October 323 255 349 54 <br />November 269 215 367 67 <br />December 154 108 338 64 <br />Period of Record 1989-1999* 1989-1999 1895-1975 1922-1999** <br /> <br />* A voiloble Period of Record 1965-1999; truncated for comporison <br />** Record is interminent: 1922-1925,1940-1965,\971-1999 <br />Source: USGS Online, 2000 <br /> <br />The decrease in flows belween the Above Pueblo and the Moffat Street gages shows the effect of <br />the diversions in the study area. Since most of the major diversions here are year round, every <br />month of the year shows a drop in flows between these gages. Data from the Near Pueblo gage <br />was compared to post 1975 data from the Above Pueblo gage to show the effects of the Pueblo <br />Dam on the hydrology of the study area. Average monthly flows for the pre- and post-darn time <br />periods are presented in Figure 2-5. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir and the Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Project have affected the hydrology of the river below the dam. Figure 2-6 shows the flow <br />duration curves developed for the pre- and post-dam periods of record. This shows that the <br />occurrence of extreme low flows (below 50 cfs) has actually decreased with the dam control; <br />however low flows, greater than 50 cfs to about 300 cfs, show an increase in occurrence. The <br />dam has reduced the frequency of occurrence of extreme low flows; however, the Winter Water <br />Storage Program (WWSP) has reduced the sustained winter flows, as a portion of the winter flow <br />is stored for release during the irrigation season. The peak flows of the river have also been <br />greatly reduced; however the release of the stored peak flows and the WWSP increase the flows <br />during the remainder of the irrigation season. <br /> <br />The peak discharges associated with return intervals ranging from the 1.25-year through 500- <br />year were determined at these gages. The flood peaks were based on Log Pearson's type III <br />analyses (WRC, 1981). Table 2-12 presents the return period floods for each gage and <br />interpolated data for Wildhorse Creek. A generalized skew of -0.1 with a weighting factor of <br />0.302 and a station skew of 0.11 were used for all analyses based on Bulletin 17B, Plate I <br />(WRC, 1981). The 100-year flood peak for the Above Pueblo gage, which is representative of <br /> <br />Arkansas RIver Flshen~s HJbltJI Res[OTJllOn, Pueblo, Colorado <br />Final Ecosystem ReSloratlon Reopon and Environmental Assessment <br />11.33 <br /> <br />Chapter II. EnVironmental Seltlng <br />September 200 I <br />