Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1610 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />This national commitment requires that Congress <br />appropriates sufficient funding for the Colorado River Basin <br />Salinity Control Program to the Bureau of Reclamation in <br />the Energy and Water Development appropriations process. <br />The fanners panicipating in the Department of Agriculture <br />component of th.e Program sh.are in the costs of <br />implementing the salinity control measures. In recognition <br />of the Congressional inclusion of USDA's Colorado River <br />Basin Salinity Control Program (CRSCP) in the <br />Environmenlal Quality Incentives Program of PL 104-127. <br />the Department of Agriculture should take all necessary <br />steps to ensure that the salinity control units being <br />implemented under the old CRSCP continue to receive <br />adequate funding under EQIP to assure full implementation <br />of those units. <br /> <br />!l is critical that Congress and the Administration continue <br />funding and implementation of the salinity control program <br />in order 10 maintain the quality of Colorado River water at <br />or below the Basin-wide water quality standard's numeric <br />cTheria values. <br /> <br />Resolution No, 97-5 <br />COMPLIANCE WIlli STATE LA W <br /> <br />The Federal Government shall comply with all applicable <br />slate laws and regulations regarding water. State law shall <br />have the deference granted in lhe Constitution of the United <br />Slates. <br /> <br />Position Statement <br />Compliance with State La... <br />(Resolution No. 97-5) <br /> <br />The 10th Amendmenlto the Constitution of the United <br />States reserves to Ihe states or people powers not delegated <br />to the United States by the Constitution or otherwise <br />prohibited by the Conslilution to the states. The states arc <br />directly responsible for many water management, planning <br />and regulatory functions and are affected by federal policies <br />and programs. <br /> <br />IS <br /> <br />If there is to be responsible, effective policy and decision- <br />making in water management, planning and regulation, Ihe <br />balance between the state governments and the federal <br />government under the 10th Amendment must be preserved. <br /> <br />Greater deference shall he given to slate and local <br />detenninations of the need for and the purposes served by <br />water projects. The federal purpose and need. as established <br />in the federal permitting process, should incorporate the <br />water project sponsor's purpose and need. No federal <br />policy, will or agenda shall frustrate or subven local needs. <br /> <br />The balance between the federal and state governments. <br />created by the 10th Amendment, has severely eroded over <br />lime. The negative impacts and damaging effects of the <br />erosion of stale and local control and authority is evident in <br />the area of water resources management. The power and <br />authority reserved to the states in the management of waler <br />resources, now usurped by the federal government; shall be <br />returned to the states and local governments. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 97-6 <br /> <br />SETILEMENT OF INDIAN RESERVED RIGHTS <br /> <br />To support the settlement of Indian reserved water rights by <br />negotiation or agreement, recognizing that: <br /> <br />I. After the resolution of Indian reserved water <br />righls by negotiated settlement, Indians and non- <br />Indians will still be neighbors sharing a common <br />resource that is vital to their continued existence; <br /> <br />2. Controversies over Indian reserved water rights <br />occur because the federal government has <br />frequently failed to fulfill ils trust duties to <br />prolect and assen tribal water righls with the <br />result thai non-Indian economies have developed <br />in reliance on rights to use water that do not <br />always adequately account for Indian reserved <br />rights; . <br />