My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08493
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:55:43 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:00:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110
Description
Colorado River-Colorado River Basin Organizations/Entities-Colorado River Water Users Association
State
CO
Date
12/17/1997
Author
CRWUA
Title
Colorado River Water Users Association-1997 Resolutions 97-1-97- 8- Annual Meeting December 17-19 1997 Ceasars Palace
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />18 <br /> <br />position Statement . <br />Safe Drinking Water Supphes <br />(Proposed ResolullOn 97 -7) <br /> <br />. blic drinking water supplies is of <br />.lon of safe pu b f this AssoCiatIon as <br />y importanCe to the mem ers 0 ess enacted the Safe <br />. to the nation generally. Congr. . the <br />, WA) in 1974 dlfecllng <br />ng Water Act (SD . tal p;otection Agency to <br />,istrator of the Envlfonm;n standards (42 U .s.C. Sec.. <br />tional drinking water qu ny 1986 (PL 99-339) by <br />ded that Act m <br />et seq.); amen other things, set <br />:ing the Administrator to, a70ng d reauthorized the Act <br />mum contaminant level goa s, an <br />. ts and changes. <br />96 with major ,mprovemen <br /> <br />roducts such as paint and <br />I contamination of consumer I' s EP A through <br />line has been a prob~;m ~~t::~Ys~::er~, has ' <br />an on lead m gasoII .' I' ental lead exposure. <br />ificantly reduced envlfonm I ss than 10 percent of an <br />d . ater makes up e <br />,onally, lea m w . . effort to assure safe <br />. ak In the contmumg . <br />It's lead mt e.. EP A and others are developmg <br />,king water supplIes, ainst lead <br />, nt methods to protect ag <br />ie stnnge <br />Ilamination. <br /> <br />. . n in water occurs as a result of p~or <br />)stlead contanunauo . and fittings in constructmg <br />, of lead-bearing solder, p,p~ businesses. The 1986 <br />,mbing systems m h~;s a~~ed a general prohibition on <br />.endments to Ihe SD. \ling or repairing plumbmg <br />f lead matenals for mSla <br />eO 6) <br />stems (42 U.S.c. 300g , <br /> <br />finalized regulations establishing <br />n June 7,1991. EPA 1 d' drl'nking water supplies. <br />. "ffilze ea m . I <br />quirements to num ttechnique of opllma <br />. d ts a treatmen <br />he regulallon a op . d cation lead service line <br />JTrosion control, public e u t' ent to reduce lead levels <br />:placement and source water trea m <br /> <br />, drinking water. <br />. l' the final regulation, <br />'PA, in addition to ,mplemen mtgexposures to lead from <br />- h blic agamS <br />hould protect t e pu f rce the ban on the use <br />t" uing loen 0 <br />lrinking water by con'~. home plumbing systems as <br />,f lead-bearing malena s m <br /> <br />160S <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />required by SDW A. Enforcement at the source of pollution <br />is more effective and efficient than requiring water <br />purveyors to introduce corrective measures. <br /> <br />CRWUA supports the definition of "control by the supplier" <br />that clearly specifies plumbing owned and operated by the <br />supplier. While public water suppliers may be able to <br />reduce the corrosivity of their drinking water, homeowners <br />are responsible for lead leaching from their own pipes. <br /> <br />Scientific and technical regulations, such as the final lead <br />regulation, must be developed allowing public input. If <br />Congress does not believe that the lead regulation is <br />stringent enough, it should legislatively direct EP A to craft <br />more stringent requirements. In this regard, public water <br />suppliers should support a mandatory public education <br />program. More stringent treatment technique requirements <br />are not feasible, cost-effective or more health protective. <br />These requirements, on the other hand, would cost water <br />users millions of dollars without significant improvement in <br />public exposure to lead in the environment generally. <br /> <br />Radon is a serious inhalation health concern in some areas <br />with a minimal contribution from the drinking water supply, <br />Because the Safe Drinking Water Act requires the regulation <br />of radon in drinking water, public water suppliers should <br />have adequate flexibility to minimize the radon water <br />lcontribution at a reasonable cost, when the radon in the <br />water contributes meaningfully to the airborne radon levels. <br />Most importantly, public education programs should be <br />supported to educate the public on ways to control radon in <br />residential homes and buildings. <br /> <br />Recent experience and investigations indicate that disposal <br />of solid waste in dump sites overlying community <br />groundwater supplies can pose a serious threat of <br />contamination to those supplies. particularly where those <br />sites are located in highly permeable areas that provide little <br />or no opponunity [0 correct failures of containment systems. <br />The federal government already exercises authority over <br />such dump sites under Resource Conservation and Recovery <br />Act (ReRA) in cooperation with state and local agencies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.