Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r t <br /> <br />0J2472 <br /> <br />Towaoc did not even have a potable water supply until 1990, under <br />the implementation of the 1986 Settlement Agreement. <br /> <br />Plans were also moving forward for comprehensive water development <br />throughout the Upper Colorado River Basin. In 1956, Congress <br />enacted the Colorado River Storage Project Act.' This Act <br />authorized the construction of initial CRSP units Curecanti, <br />Flaming Gorge, Navajo and Glen Canyon; participating projects <br />including the Florida Project; and the preparation of planning <br />reports -- including the Animas-La Plata and Dolores Projects, The <br />Florida Project was completed to serye lands on Florida Mesa in <br />1963, which included some Indian lands but which did not completely <br />meet Indian needs. ~ <br /> <br />The CRSP Act also established a mechanism for assisting in the <br />funding of construction of these and other projects, through the <br />creation of the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund (the "Basin Fund"). <br />In short, hydroelectric power revenues generated from the CRSP are <br />credited to the Fund to pay for certain construction, operation and <br />maintenance costs of the initial CRSP units. The balance of any <br />revenues are credited to each of the upper basin states to pay for <br />that portion of the construction costs of participating projects <br />allocated to irrigation, that are beyond the ability of irrigation <br />contractees to repay. Additionally, participating projects can <br />take advantage of favorable rates for CRSP power. <br /> <br />In 1968, Congress enacted the Colorado River Basin Project Act.' <br />Among other things, the CRBP Act authorized the construction of the <br />Animas-La Plata and Dolores Projects, concurrent with the <br />completion of the Central Arizona Project. The authorization for <br />the Animas-La Plata project was for a configuration substantially <br />different than the presently proposed configuration.' However, the <br />Project was always contemplated to serve both Indian and non-Indian <br />municipal, industrial and irrigation needs.s <br /> <br />'p,L. 84-485; 70 Stat. 105; 43 U.S.C. 620. <br /> <br />'P.L. 9G-537; 82 Stat. 885; 43 U.S.C. 1505. <br /> <br />'Sect.ion 501 (c) of the 1968 CRBP Act provides that the A-LP Project be <br />constructed "in substantial accordance with the engineering plans set out in the <br />report of the Secretary transmitted to the Congress on May 4, 1966, and printed <br />as House Document 436, Eighty-ninth Congress... II In contrast to the present. <br />configuration, the Project then contemplated the construction of Howardsville <br />Reservoir above Silverton, a diversion from the Animas River near Electra Lake <br />above Durango, Animas Mountain Reservoir, and extensive facilities in the La <br />Plata Basin, including Hay Gulch Reservoir, Three Buttes Reservoir and Ute <br />Meadows Reservoir. <br /> <br />5Changes in the proposed configuration of the Project were made in the 1966 <br />Report included in House Document 436, to increase municipal and industrial <br />supplies, and decrease irrigation supplies. A summary of the proposal water <br />supply and depletions as of the 1968 CRBP Act is as follows; <br /> <br />3 <br />