Laserfiche WebLink
<br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />.20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />~ <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />:11 <br />III if- ,- <br />(VI" <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br /> <br />3. Reclamation would provide $50,000 in funding for the capture of wild-born or first <br />generation (Fl) bony tails from Lake Mohave to be incorporated into the broodstock for <br />this species and/or to support rearing efforts at Achii Hanyo, a satellite rearing facility <br />of Willow Beach National Fish Hatchery, These efforts would be funded for 5 years, <br /> <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br /> <br />4. A two-tiered conservation plan has been developed to minimize potential impacts to <br />occupied willow flycatcher habitat that could result due to reduced flows on the <br />Colorado River between Parker and Imperial Dams as water transfers and associated <br />changes in point of delivery are implemented, The details of the Plan may be found <br />below, and in the BO. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Implementation Agreement Alternatives <br /> <br />Because the purpose of the proposed action is to provide Federal approval of an agreement <br />negotiated among the California parties, no other action alternatives are being considered. The <br />QSA is a consensual agreement among three parties (CVWD, lID, and MWD) that resolves <br />long-standing disputes regarding the priority, use, and transferability of Colorado River water, <br />The proposed IA reflects that consensual agreement. The IA and QSA have been developed in <br />response to the Secretary's 1996 statement that California must implement a strategy to enable <br />the State to limit its use of Colorado River water to 4.4 MAF during a normal year or develop <br />the means to meet its water needs from sources that do not jeopardize the delivery of Colorado <br />River water to other States, Development of a strategy to reduce California's diversions of <br />Colorado River water is considered by the Secretary to be a prerequisite for Secretarial approval <br />of any further cooperative Colorado River water transfers among California agencies, The other <br />Colorado River Basin States are also aware of the implications of the IA and QSA, and are very . <br />interested in and supportive of California's progress in reducing its Colorado River water/ <br />diversions. . <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />Inadvertent Overrun Policy Alternatives <br /> <br />Many alternative concepts and issues were considered in the development of the proposed lOP. <br />Much interest and many ideas were identified during the scoping process and in response to <br />the draft policy published in the Federal Register. As a result of considering public comment, <br />one additional lOP alternative has been developed, and is considered, along with the proposed <br />action, in this EIS, <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />No Forgiveness During Flood Releases Alternative <br /> <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br /> <br />The proposed lOP contains a provision that in a year during which the Secretary makes a flood <br />control release or a space building release, any accumulated amount in an overrun account <br />would be forgiven, The No-Forgiveness Alternative would eliminate that provision. Under <br />this alternative, during a flood control or space building release year, the overrun account <br />would be deferred, but not forgiven, Payback would resume in the next year when such <br />releases are not scheduled. All other provisions would be the same as the proposed lOP. <br /> <br />LA, lOP, and Related Federal Actions EIS <br /> <br />DEIS -January 2002 <br /> <br />E5-5 <br /> <br />~ <br />