Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />r-. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />r.- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Table ES-l, Summary of Potential Impacls of the Execution of the lA, Adoption of the lOP, and Implementation of Biological <br />?= Conservation Measures (Page 28 of 29) <br />- <br />o <br />:0 <br />" <br />~ <br />"- <br />:>:I <br />'" <br />;;- <br />- <br />'" <br />"- <br />.,., <br />'" <br />"- <br />" <br />, <br />!:. <br />:>> <br />" <br />- <br />c. <br />~ <br />'" <br />'" <br />- <br />II> <br /> <br />tI <br />'" <br />- <br />II> <br />I <br />- <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />" <br />~ <br />N <br />Q <br />Q <br />N <br /> <br />Resource/Issue No Action Impacts of Proposed Action/Alternatives <br /> TRANSBOUNDARylMPACTS <br />Implementation Agreement <br />Potential changes to the probability and Hydrology. From years 2002 to 2026, the Hydrology. The probability and magnitude of <br />magnitude of excess flows to Mexico. probability of excess flows varies from 20 to 25 excess flows to Mexico is similar but occasionally <br /> percent. After 2030, the probability of flood flows higher under the IA. <br /> decreases to 10 to 15 percent. The magnitude of <br /> flood flows varies from 0 to over 6 MAF, with large <br /> flood flows (over 250 KAF) anticipated <br /> approximately 20 percent of the time and flood <br /> flows over 1 MAF less than 15 percent of lime. <br /> TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS <br />Potential impacts to habitat and species in Biological Resources. It is anticipated that flood Biological Resources. The fA would result in a flood <br />Mexico. flow frequency and quantities would be reduced as flow probability and magnitude that are generally <br /> additional water is used by the Upper Division equallo, or some~hat greater than, the No-Action <br /> States. This may result in some reduction of Alternative. Therefore, this action would have no <br /> wildlife habitat through the reduction in flows potent.ial impact on any federally listed species in <br /> reaching the Delta area. It is expected, however, Mexico. <br /> that much of the existing habitat would remain as it <br /> is since most of the riparian habitat is composed of <br /> salt cedar, which would be fed by groundwater. <br /> No measurable impact is expected to sensitive <br /> marine species. <br /> <br />tT1 <br />'f' <br />w <br />" <br /> <br />~ <br />'" <br />II <br />- <br />;. <br />'" <br />~ <br />3 <br />:l <br />" <br />~ <br />