My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08430
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:58:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Unknown
Title
Executive Summary - Task 4 Technical Memorandum on Hydrology Water Rights and Development of Basin Model - Yampa River Basin Alternatives Feasibility Study - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001141 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />that reservoirs are allowed (with the exception of possible minimum release requirements) to store all <br />inflows in excess of 1989-level demand, <br /> <br />All future demands are considered junior to the Juniper rights and junior to storage tn the three <br />existing reservoirs. These demands are satisfied- first through direct flow diversions; remaining <br />deficiencies are then made up by reservoir releases or by subordination of the Juniper water rights. <br /> <br />REVIEW OF USFWS MODELING <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />In 1986, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) applied the HYDROSS methodology to the <br />Yampa and Green River basins to assist in assessing the cumulative impacts of water developments for <br />irrigation, power, municipal, and recreation. HYDROSS is a system of computer programs developed by <br />the USFWS for conducting monthly water supply studies along traditional accounting lines, Application <br />to the Yar;npa and Green Rivers was aimed primarily at identifying the impacts <).ssodated with the <br />Stagecoach Reservoir Project near Steamboat Springs. Four separate scenarios were investigated and <br />included simulating historical conditions, present level of development, a future. level of development <br />with all proposed projects likely to be developed, and a baseline plus the proposed Stagecoach Project, <br />These scenarios were used to define Interim Flow Recommendations at Deerlodge Park. The <br />corresponding flows at Maybell are referred to as the "Environmental Baseline", <br /> <br />Data and assumptions used in the Yampa River Basin HYDROSS application have been reviewed <br />in depth in an effort to fully understand the meaning of the environmental baseline flows, The review <br />included the modeled hydrology, water demands, an assessment of reliability of demand forecasts, and <br />identification of water development projects included in the environmental baseline definition. The <br />assumptions of the HYDROSS modeling were represented in a network model of the basin to further <br />assist in developing this understanding, ' <br /> <br />Hydrology and Demands Represented in the HYDROSS Model <br /> <br />Inflow data for the HYDROSS model runs were generated using the V.S, I\ureau of Reclamation <br />Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) data base. CRSS "natural flows" are established by taking the <br />observed flows at certain USGS gaging stations and adding estimates of all historic depletions from the <br />stream. CRSS flows are hardwired into the HYDROSS model. <br /> <br />In order to simulate historical conditions along the Yampa River, the USGS gage data at Maybell <br />were substituted in place of the HYDROSS Natural Flow Database. This was achieved in the Yampa <br />Basin model using a "correction" depletion as the difference between the CRS$ natural flow and the <br />recorded flow at the Maybell gage. This effeCtively set the flow tei the historical Maybell record, <br /> <br />To simulate existing demand conditions. depletions were modeled up to the year when they <br />commenced. Because Ihe model is based on gage hydrology, there is no need to model the demand <br />after the depletion came on line; it is already Implied ,in the gaged record, The change from historical to <br />existing conditions involved adding depletions over portions of the 1930- I 982 period. These <br />adjustments were applied for Hayden Units I and 2 (7,100 at) prior to 1966 and Craig Units 1 and 2 <br />(12,800 af) prior to 1981. The proposed Cheyenne Stage I project (8,000 at) is located on the little <br />. Snake River and was not considered in defining conditions under the existing demand. <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.