Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o () 1167 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />In order to. maintain consistency, all demand increments added to the model to adjust gage <br />hydrology to current conditions should likewise be considered senior to the Juniper right. To do <br />othervvise would mean, for example, that thermal-electric depletions from 19jO to 1974 would be junior <br />to Juniper and depletions from 1975 to 1982 (which are embedded in gage hydrology) would be senior. <br />Accordingly, all demand arcs representing such adjustments are assigned IJriorities higher than the <br />priority assigned to the T&E instream now right. Similarly, all existing reservoirs represented in the <br />model are given storage priorities higher than the Juniper right; this assumption is justified by the <br />subordinations of the Juniper rights discussed earlier. <br /> <br />At this time the relative priorities between demands that are considered senior to Juniper are <br />differentiated on the basis of priority rcbtive to the Maybe-II Canal. Differentiation of these priorities is <br />necessary only if there is insul'ficient supply available to meet them all. If differentiation is necessary, the <br />relative priorities are determined from the absolute water rights that support thos..:" demands. <br /> <br />Demand arcs representing future demand increments were assigned priorities lower than the <br />Juniper right. This rellects the conservative assumption that all future demands are dependent on junior <br />water rights. At this time relative ranks of future demands arc differentiated only in an order to access <br />specific storage contracts in existing reservoirs in a prescribed order. It is important to remember that <br />differentiation of priorities is necessary only if there is an inadequate legal and physical supply to meet <br />all demands (the legal constraint could be eliminated if the subordination were sized to protect all <br />future uses). <br /> <br />General Reservoir Operations <br /> <br />Three existing ieservoirs are operated in the Yampa River Basin Model: Stagecoach Reservoir, <br />Steamboat Lake, and Elkhead Reservoir. The operations of all other existing reservoirs are assumed to <br />have negligible effect on flows below Stagecoach Reservoir eitller because of their small size or because <br />of their mode of operation. The model network is currently configured to represent nine reservoirs. Six <br />of these reservoirs are currently undeveloped but re~nain in consideration as possible future projects. <br />These reservoirs have effectively been turned off in the first sets of model runs by constraining the <br />capacities of storage arcs and evaporation to zero now. <br /> <br />Reservoir evaporation and storage carryover are automated in the CRAM modeling system. <br />Storage and release operations are driven by the relative priorities between reservoirs and demands. If <br />demands are ranked higher than reservoirs, 'the model will allocate water to demands before allowing <br />reservoirs to fill and will draw water out of storage to satisfy demands unmet by 'natural flows. If <br />reservoirs are ranked higher than demands, reservoirs will be filled first and demands will be unable to <br />draw water out of st()rage: the reservoirs will subsequently store only enough water to make up <br />evaporati~::m. <br /> <br />In practice what is usually dCsire'd is an interleaving of storage and demand priorities in order to <br />simulate the operation of a conservation pool and a recreation pool. The conservalion pool should be <br />emptied to meet unsatisfied demands but the recreation pool should not. This is accomplished by the <br />use of link arcs representing storage volume targets. The diseussion below describes how the basin <br />model accomplishes reservoir operations in general sense. This discussion is followed by a description <br />of the operating rules that were assumed for the three existing reservoirs. <br /> <br />The operations of both existing and proposed reservoirs are simulated through the use of a <br />common construct of network arcs. A hypothetical reservoir structure is shown as Figure 4~3. Target <br />arcs appear as parallel ares labelled "Tl, T2, 1'3" in the reservoir sub-network. The sizes (capacities) and <br />relative priorities of these target are set according to assumed ownership accounts in' the reservoir. <br />