Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001158 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />Representation of the Transfer in the Basin Model <br /> <br />As the final mechanism for accomplishing the transfer-of Juniper rights ",0 in stream flow use is <br />not yet defined, the basin model has been configured to simulate two mechanisms, the subordination of <br />the Juniper right to future depletions and the transfer of Juniper rights to existing and proposed <br />reservoirs. The alternative of transferring pieces of the Juniper right to each junior water right was not <br />implemented in the model since that would have required that the model represent each of those junior <br />rights. In effect, this alternative would be indistinguishable from the subordination mechanism. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT OF BASIN NETWORK MODEL <br /> <br />8ackground <br /> <br />The Yampa Rivcr basin modcl is an application of Hydrosphere's Central Resource Allocation <br />Model (CRAM). CRAM is a proprietary software package which facilitates the representation of complex <br />water resources systems as networks amenable to solution using mathematical programming methods. <br />This section of the memorandum describes the development of the basin model. <br /> <br />A wide variety or resource allocation problems in which commodities must be moved from point <br />to point (either spatially or temporally) can be visualized as networks. Com'modities might be raw <br />materials needed for industrial production or water needcd to meet various demands. Typically the <br />movement of commodities in such problems is to be accomplished in such a way as to maximize value or <br />minimize costs. <br /> <br />In general, networks are structured as a system 'of nodes and arcs. [n a water resource <br />application, nodes may serve as points of inflow, outflow and junction of flow while arcs connect nodes <br />and may represent pathways or processes through which water must flow.' The flow along any arc may <br />have a positive or negati,ve unit cost or value' associated with it; the cost is often referred to as a prioritY <br />or a rank.. The solution of the network is the set of arc flows that produces the minimum total cost (or <br />maximum total value) for the entire network. Mathematically, the problem can be stated as follows: <br /> <br />minimize Z = 2:2: c..x.. <br />- tJ tJ <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />subject to: <br /> <br />(.. < x.. < u.. <br />tJ- tl- tJ <br />2: x.. - 2: x.. = 0 <br />tJ It <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />where: <br />i = l,...,m <br />j = l,...,n <br />m = n '" the number of nodes <br />X;j is the amount flowing from nodc i to node'j <br />cij is the unit cost (or value) of now from i to j <br />lij is the lowest flow allowed in arc ij (often 0) <br />uij is the highest flow allowed in arc ij <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />l. <br /> <br />:; <br />,ih.~~.i'. <br />