Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />n"'~'7'~ <br />iJ ~ U ~ 'j: J <br /> <br />In order to facilitate adequate review time as well <br />as meeting consultant data needs in a timely manner, the <br />following was suggested: <br />1. ) develope virgin flow estimates for <br />identified for expanded network coverage <br />Phase 1 methodologies. <br />2.) Complete Phase 1 methodology review. <br />3.) If review recommendations so indicate, revised <br />methods should be applied to develope new flows for <br />the entire model network. <br /> <br />nodes <br />using <br /> <br />Provision of flows to consultant in a timely <br />manner is important in order to avoid schedule <br />impacts; provision of flows is required for model <br />calibration; time requirements of calibration <br />process may preclude possibility submitting <br />multiple flow versions as modifications are made; <br />Feasibility of proposed flow development procedure <br />requires verification by consultant.) <br /> <br />Agenda Item 3: Expanded Network Flow Development Activities <br /> <br />The Denver Office provided a list of 39 stations for which <br />they plan to develope virgin flow estimates. (See Attachment <br />5). The subcommittee reviewed the list in order to identify <br />sites for network node virgin flow development. Identified <br />sites are listed in Attachment 6. <br /> <br />Agenda Item 4: Accounting Spreadsheet Development Methodology <br /> <br />-- Time did not perIni t Item 4 discussion; this topic was <br />selected for discussion at the next subcommittee meeting; <br />(scheduled for Tuesday, September 24 at Denver CWCB offices) <br />