Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'.1 <br /> <br />01)2333 <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />Site Selection Recommendations <br /> <br />Based on these evaluations, the multi-disciplinary evaluation team developed a set of <br />preliminary recommendations regarding the sites that should be carried forward into <br />formulation of alternatives, Upon reviewing these recommendations, TSG determined that an <br />additional long-term upper basin alternative should be considered, namely, the enlargement of <br />the existing Stagecoach Reservoir. Substantial data on this alternative already existed in the <br />Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Stagecoach Project. This permitted the <br />site to be added and Considered without conducting additional field evaluation. The sites <br />ultimately recommended for further consideration are listed in Table S-3, <br /> <br />Table 8-3 <br /> <br />Sites Recommended for Further Consideration <br /> <br />I. Stagecoach Reservoir Enlargement <br />2. Elk Creek Off-channel Storage <br />3. Elkhead Reservoir Enlargement <br />4, Williams Fork near Hamilton <br />5, East Fork Williams Fork above Willow Creek <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT OF BASIN MODEL <br /> <br />Once the potential sites for new reservoir storage had been identified, the next objective <br />of the Study was to evaluate each site's potential for meeting future water needs in the basin. <br />A hydrologic computer model of the basin was developed in order to quantitatively perform <br />these evaluations, In addition to simulating the basic hydrologic and water supply operations <br />in the basin, the model permits ihe inclusion of proposed reservoirs and water management <br />strategies and describes the resulting water deliveries, reservoir levels, and streamflow <br />conditions throughout the basin. <br /> <br />The model represents the hydrology, water demands, reservoir operations, and water <br />rights administration of the basin on a monthly basis over a 53-year hydrologic study period <br />encompassing water years 1930 through 1982, This is the same study period used in previous <br />modeling work performed by the Service to develop the Interim Flow Recommendations for <br />the recovery of the endangered fishes in the Yampa River, The period includes a wide range <br />of hydrologic conditions, from drought years to flood years, and permits an assessment of the <br />long-term effects of changes in water development and management, The results of model runs <br />were compared in order to quantitatively determine the ability of different development <br />alternatives to meet basin water needs under a variety of operating assumptions, <br /> <br />Model Configuration <br /> <br />The Yampa River basin Model was configured as a network of arcs and nodes and <br />utilizes network flow programming methods. Figure S-3 shows the basin model network, <br />This network representation of the basin has a physical appearance much like a map of the <br />river including tributaries, reservoirs and diversion points, The model accepts input of gaged <br />inflows and water demands, simulates the allocation of these flows to network arcs <br />representing various water rights and uses in the basin, and predicts the resulting streamflow <br />conditions in reaches of interest. The mathematical solution procedure of the model insures <br /> <br />S-13 <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />'t:t .<> <br />