Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter III Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 29 <br /> <br />compliance with this standard. The standard is for long-term trends. The salinity program is <br />designed to offset any long-term effects including those created by Glen Canyon Dam and <br />Lake Powell (or any other project in the Basin). <br /> <br />Under the No-Action Alternative, the goal of the salinity program would be to continue to <br />fmd cost-effective ways to maintain water quality standards. The Proposed Action <br />alternative would increase the variability of the salinity released from the dam but would not <br />change the long-term discharge of salinity. Salinity is routed conservatively in the reservoir <br />(USDI 1997). Salinity in the Colorado River varies more from changes in hydrologic <br />conditions (e.g., runoff) than from any other single factor. Any change in the operation of the <br />outlets may influence the salinity of the river, but only in temporary ways. Salinities in the <br />Grand Canyon may vary, but mixing in Lake Mead would continue to remove most of the <br />seasonal variation in the system. <br /> <br />Selenium - Water quality data in the reservoir near the dam show that selenium levels are <br />fairly uniform with depth. Values are typically 2 ug/L in summer and may vary +1- I ug/L <br />through the year. The USDI (1997) reported average selenium levels below Glen Canyon <br />Dam were 2.5 ug/L. The action alternative would have little or no effect on the value. <br /> <br />Nutrients and Their Effects on Primary Productivity - A balance of nutrients is critical to <br />the ecology of any aquatic ecosystem. Low levels of nutrients generally limit productivity <br />higher in the food chain (fisheries). High levels of nutrients cause systems to strangle on <br />their own wastes, depressing dissolved oxygen levels. Large, long reservoirs like Lake <br />Powell are very efficient at retaining nutrients in the reservoir through biological processes <br />and settling. Nutrients discharged from Glen Canyon Dam under existing conditions are <br />extremely low. <br /> <br />In 1981-1982, an intensive study was jointly conducted by Reclamation and the Lake Mead <br />Limnological Research Center, University of Nevada (Paulson and Baker 1983). The study <br />was conducted to survey nutrient bioavailability, algae productivity, and limnological <br />characteristics of the Lake Powell and Lake Mead. <br /> <br />The study found that total phosphorus concentrations are relatively high coming into Lake <br />Powell. However, a major portion of the total phosphorus load settles out of the water <br />column with sediments in the inflow zone of the reservoirs. This phosphorus is not readily <br />available to biological processes downstream. The high iron oxide content of the Colorado <br />River water gives it the distinguishing red color (for which the basin is famous) and reduces <br />phosphorus concentrations via ion adsorption. Thus, when the sediment settles out, it also <br />removes large quantities of phosphorus, Lake Powell can retain nearly 98 percent of the <br />inflowing total phosphorus (Paulson and Baker 1983; Miller et al. 1983). A similar storage <br />effect is repeated in Lake Mead. The entire mainstem Colorado River Basin remains very <br />phosphorus limited throughout most of the system. Tributaries inflows (example: Paria <br />River, Little Colorado River, and Las Vegas Wash) are an important sources of phosphorus <br />in the river below Glen Canyon Dam. <br /> <br />This settling process can be reversed in Lakes Powell and Mead when the reservoirs are <br />drawn down and the sediment deltas are resuspended. Beneath the water-sediment interface <br />