My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08397
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08397
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:58:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.300
Description
Lower Gunnison Basin Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1981
Title
Lower Gunnison Basin Unit/ Colorado - Status Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />valley plus some canals on the west side for a net lining length of 335 <br /> <br />miles of the 552 miles 1n the project. At that time, the net cost- <br /> <br />effectiveness of the plan was $368,000 per mg/L, the total con- <br /> <br />struction cost was $106 million, and the salt reduction at Imperial Dam <br /> <br />was 19.8 mg/L. Analysis IV was displayed and explained at the environ- <br />mental scoping meeting. No significant negative responses were voiced <br />regarding this plan. <br /> <br />The 335 miles of canal and lateral lining were gradually reduced by <br /> <br />5 miles as feasibility-level information was developed between March and <br /> <br />September 1980. New data included piezometer tests, additional well <br /> <br />monitoring, and intensive analysis of the water-salt transfer mechanisms. <br /> <br />Based on the new data, a feasibility-level cost estimate for the <br /> <br />recoDDDended plan developed with the public was determined to be $178 <br /> <br />million (October 1980 prices). The costs and impacts of lining the <br /> <br />remainder of the canals and laterals on the west side were not quantified <br /> <br />as they were considered to be a relatively poor salinity control invest- <br /> <br />ment based upon earlier analyses. The net result of these computations <br /> <br />yielded a cost-effectiveness figure for the recoDDDended plan that was <br /> <br />developed with the public of $1,100,000 per mg/L, using a 7-3/8 percent, <br />50-year amortization criterion. Based on this analysis, a new plan was <br /> <br />formulated wherein canal and lateral lining for the west side of the <br /> <br />valley was deleted. <br /> <br />Based on this approach, Water and Power's recoDDDended plan is <br /> <br />described below. <br /> <br />Water and Power's RecoDDDended Plan <br /> <br />A total of about 254 miles would be concrete lined under the recom- <br /> <br />mended plan. Where field conditions warrant, flexible lining w~idldiaO <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.