Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. By HUTIlIlEll)E <br />I\L^~'IOS^ - The proposal to con. <br />'It the Great 0alld Dunes National <br />011 11 II I(.'U 1 into:\ national parl{ is IllOV' <br />,~ forward "at it speed which I have <br />'VCI" see II all)' Il'gislal.iv~~ action move <br />-lore," Ivloll\llHcnt Superintendent <br />C\"l; Chanc)' told Valh:y COli II!.)' CUlIl' <br />issiollcrs on Tuesday. <br />The change would require Congrcs- <br />111;11 approval. <br />Chancy said there arc three desires <br />'ivillg tile monument-tn-park proposal <br />rwanl: 1) to provide permanent pro. <br /> <br />~), <br />( . <br />): <br /> <br />lccliulI 10 die salld (llIBe .system; 2) to <br />incrcase tourism; und 3) to eliminate <br />the l~nl'a Ranch as a waleI' development <br />threal. <br />The first reason, to protect the dune <br />system, is whallhc Nat.ional Park Ser- <br />vice is most. int.crc$t.cd in, CIHlllCY said. <br />Arca businesses l,nd indllstricsnrc most <br />interested in t.he sccoIlll desire, t.o in- <br />crease tourism. The third reason,. to <br />eliminate t.he water .t.hreat, "js a long <br />standing isslle that thiscommunity has <br />come together over... the past dcclHlc or <br />so. <br /> <br />"~ronically, what w~ have learned <br />about this system and been ahle to iden. <br />tify has come about since ^ WDI." Be. <br />fore AWDI (^merican Water Develop. <br />ment Inc.), there was no' threat }WI-' <br />ceived significant enough to force the <br />research on th.c 5ystcl11,.I1O ~aid. <br />In addition to eliminating the waler <br />threat, pUl"chasil'igthe llncH would bring <br />wildlife and wetlands into a national <br />park, Chancy said. <br />Chancy spoke briefly about some of <br />the obstacles to converting the lllOIl\I- <br />men~ to a parle . <br /> <br />Dunes <br /> <br />. ". <br /> <br />I:, <br /> <br />. Continued from page 1 <br /> <br />and Wildlife land. It is similar to Payment In Lieu ofTa,.;s (PILT), <br />Chancy said. . <br />He added that there -arc some CUllccrllS in the l3aca Grande <br />coml11ullitv ahout the impact.of growth' ill their neighborhoods. <br />Some'ufi.l1~)sccuIJCcrnscanJiot he an~weJ:l'tl right now, Chancy said, <br />eXCl'pt (0 point tu similar situat.ions elsewhere. . <br />That kind of concern should he handled throu~h mamlljcI11cnt <br />pl;\lli1il1~ which will occllr after legislation passes and the park <br />houndaries are drawn. Local input will be a part of that manage- <br />mentplanlliJl~, he ~aid." . <br />Clianey i\ddr('ss'cd apointofconfusioll which has arrsen surround- <br />.in~ the mOIHIlIlenl.to-p:uk proposal. lie said an Environmental <br />Impact Statement is Bot required hefore the legislature approves <br />the park conversion. Once the legislature cumpletes its part of the <br />process, puhlic input will be required, he said. <br />"I ~hink therc's a n~ally good Jlotential fOI" the cnd product to be <br />sOll1cthil~g that everyuody gai.ns frum," Chancy s~id. <br /> <br />~ <br />\...:--~.) <br />--~:--'" <br /> <br />Ill' said there is "a lut of cOllversati()l~ <br />hetween partics right now" to try to..' <br />nll.eviate potential conflicts before they. <br />anse. <br />The main obstacles, he said, arc: <br />mOlley to acquire the llaca; stnte and' <br />federal land issues; and .property tax <br />luss in Saguache Count.y. <br />"Money to acquire the l3aca is obv~- <br />ously BumberoJle," Chaney said. Other <br />than lheprivately.owilCd Baca and land <br />owned by the Nature Conscrv.ancy, the <br />property needcd to expand th.c duncs,t!? <br />a park is largely state and.fedcrallnnd, <br />Chancy said. One problem with the <br />state/federallands going into a national ~ <br />park is the loss of some of the uses such: <br />as hunting and grazing, Chancy said. : <br />However, with the Uaca'purchase~some ~ <br />land could be traded arollIld with the' <br />fede'ral and state agencies "to offsetth'at,' <br />somewhat, to .create some hunting" <br />managed wildlife opportunities that: <br />currently don't exist." - <br />As far as the potential loss of property: <br />tax t.o Saguache County, Chancy said: <br />there might be a way of recovering some: <br />of that loss through a ,Refuge Revenue: <br />Sharing ^cl which applies to U.S. Fi~!l: <br /> <br />. Please see Dunes page 5 <br /> <br />'0) <br />,.~_:.~/ ~ <br />~\'.'" <br />....f.;.,;;. <br />