Laserfiche WebLink
<br />cO <br />:n <br />"~ <br />'"'"' <br />-, Memorandum <br />c..) Forum/V~orJ: Group <br />January 28, 1983 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />2010 as happens under the up-front cost-sharing alternative. <br />We concluded that the up-front cost-sharing alternative was <br />a more atbractive alternative for the Basin states. <br /> <br />Impact on the Basin Funds <br /> <br />We computed the impact on the Basin Funds of only the <br />up-front money cost sharing alternative, since the repayment <br />with interest alter.native was more costly to the Basin states. <br />The increased e:>ne:>rgy ch;Jr<]e:> that would hav" lo he ]('v,i.orj for <br />each Basin j,'und was based on a total annual paYllItluL ot S.LO.l <br />million for salinity control over a 27 year period, that would <br />be allocated with $1.5 million to the Upper Basin Fund and <br />$8.6 million per year for the Lower Basin Fund, an additional <br />charge of about 2.5 mills per kwh would need to be applied to <br />o the Hoover-Parker-Davis output. The added charge nec~ed to <br />raise $1.5 million for the Upper Basin Fund would be about <br />0.3 mills per kwh. <br /> <br />o~,~, ~<L__"'\' <br /> <br />Myron B. Holburt <br />Chairman, Work Group <br />